Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Mobile and Web AppsMobile and Web Apps
VS
Grupo TragsaGrupo Tragsa
Mobile and Web Apps

Mobile and Web Apps

210-276 Carlaw Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M4M 3L1, undefined

Last Update: 11/05/2026

View Profile
755/1000Fair

Make recycling and waste information for your residents easy to find! Recycle Coach’s fully responsive web app is designed for resident usability and fits seamlessly onto your current website. The corresponding smartphone app allows residents to find information about t...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:65
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Grupo Tragsa

Grupo Tragsa

C/ Maldonado 58, Madrid, ES, 28006

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tragsa.es
773/1000Fair

Tragsa Group is a group of public companies, integrated in the State Industrial Ownership Corporation (SEPI), which has become a full service supplier and a reference company to Public Administrations. It is formed by four enterprises: Tragsa (1977) responsible for wor...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:11,674
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Mobile and Web Apps

Mobile and Web Apps

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grupo Tragsa

Grupo Tragsa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mobile and Web Apps in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Tragsa in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Mobile and Web Apps (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mobile and Web Apps cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grupo Tragsa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Tragsa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Mobile and Web Apps

Mobile and Web Apps

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Grupo Tragsa

Grupo Tragsa

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Mobile and Web Apps company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Mobile and Web Apps company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Mobile and Web Apps company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Mobile and Web Apps company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Mobile and Web Apps company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Mobile and Web Apps company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Mobile and Web Apps company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Mobile and Web Apps company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Mobile and Web Apps company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Mobile and Web Apps company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Mobile and Web Apps company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Mobile and Web Apps and Grupo Tragsa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Mobile and Web Apps and Grupo Tragsa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Mobile and Web Apps or Grupo Tragsa ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Mobile and Web Apps or Grupo Tragsa ?
Between Mobile and Web Apps and Grupo Tragsa, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Mobile and Web Apps and Grupo Tragsa, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
Mobile-&-web-apps vs Grupo-tragsa - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating | Rankiteo