Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Minnesota National GuardMinnesota National Guard
VS
U.S. Air Force ReserveU.S. Air Force Reserve
Minnesota National Guard

Minnesota National Guard

Minnesota, US

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
757/1000Fair

The Minnesota National Guard is a joint force of citizen Soldiers and Airmen that serve our state and nation with the Governor as their Commander in Chief, assisting during disasters and other emergencies. In times of war, Minnesota National Guard Soldiers and Airmen ca...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:1,573
Subsidiaries:58
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
U.S. Air Force Reserve

U.S. Air Force Reserve

180 Page Road, Bldg 208, Robins AFB, GA, US, 31098

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://afreserve.com/
773/1000Fair

The Air Force Reserve is an integral component of our Nation's air defense and military support network. Reservists bring knowledge, skills and expertise from their civilian experiences to support critical missions and training around the globe, while working alongside ...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:19,005
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Minnesota National Guard

Minnesota National Guard

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
U.S. Air Force Reserve

U.S. Air Force Reserve

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minnesota National Guard in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. Air Force Reserve in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Minnesota National Guard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minnesota National Guard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - U.S. Air Force Reserve (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Air Force Reserve cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Minnesota National Guard

Minnesota National Guard

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
U.S. Air Force Reserve

U.S. Air Force Reserve

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Minnesota National Guard company and U.S. Air Force Reserve company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Minnesota National Guard company and U.S. Air Force Reserve company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Minnesota National Guard company and U.S. Air Force Reserve company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Minnesota National Guard company and U.S. Air Force Reserve company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Minnesota National Guard company and U.S. Air Force Reserve company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Minnesota National Guard company and U.S. Air Force Reserve company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Minnesota National Guard company and U.S. Air Force Reserve company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Minnesota National Guard company and U.S. Air Force Reserve company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Minnesota National Guard company and U.S. Air Force Reserve company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Minnesota National Guard company and U.S. Air Force Reserve company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Minnesota National Guard company and U.S. Air Force Reserve company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Minnesota National Guard and U.S. Air Force Reserve, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Minnesota National Guard and U.S. Air Force Reserve, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Minnesota National Guard or U.S. Air Force Reserve ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Minnesota National Guard or U.S. Air Force Reserve ?
Between Minnesota National Guard and U.S. Air Force Reserve, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Minnesota National Guard and U.S. Air Force Reserve, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81934
SUMMARY

Redis contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the 'tlsProcessPendingData()' function, which handles the TLS pending-data list if Redis is configured with TLS support. A remote, unauthenticated attacker may be able to execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the Redis server. Fixed in Redis 8.2.9, 8.4.6, 8.6.6, 8.8.2, and 8.10.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-27
UPDATED
Date2026-08-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-81931
SUMMARY

Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type in the product photo upload in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.16.0 allows an authenticated user holding the create product permission (routine Seller role) to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the application origin. The photo validation rule classifies the file only by its content (magic bytes) and rejects only a fixed list of PHP extensions, while ProductSaveController::save() names the stored file using the client-supplied extension and copies it into the public web root. A file that begins with an image header and carries an HTML extension passes validation, is stored under public/asset/upload/product/, and is served with a text/html content type, turning the upload into first-party stored script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-27
UPDATED
Date2026-08-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-81893
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in gdk-pixbuf. When loading a specially crafted JPEG image containing chunked ICC profile markers, an error during ICC profile parsing can leave stale size metadata after the profile buffer is freed. A subsequent allocation in the same decode can cause an out-of-bounds write, potentially crashing the application. To exploit this flaw, an application using gdk-pixbuf must process the malicious JPEG image. Affected version >= 2.26.4

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-27
UPDATED
Date2026-08-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-81838
SUMMARY

A relative path traversal issue in the zip extraction functionality in AWS diagram-as-code (awsdac) in versions 0.10 through 0.23 can allow a third party to write arbitrary files to the local filesystem via crafted zip entry names containing path traversal sequences. This could allow the third party to perform inappropriate actions in the diagram bundle. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to the version 0.24 or later.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-27
UPDATED
Date2026-08-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-81834
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in RooCodeInc Roo-Code up to 3.51.1. Affected by this issue is the function ExecaTerminalProcess of the component README File Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to code injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Multiple isses were reported to the vendor beforehand. They explain, that "they all apply to Roo Code, a project we no longer support - the repository was archived a while ago, and we don't encourage anyone to use it." This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-27
UPDATED
Date2026-08-27
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8