Comparison Overview
Léons

Léons
De Boelelaan 1065, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, 1082 SB, NL
Last Update: 17/02/2026
Er is maar één belang en dat is het belang van de klant. U vertrouwt ons uw riskmanagement toe. Vaak jaren achtereen, soms generatie op generatie. Uw en onze reputatie zijn ons daarom alles waard. Dat is de reden dat wij alleen nieuwe klanten accepteren op introductie v...

Groupama
8-10 rue d'astorg, Paris, 75008, FR
Last Update: 04/09/2026
« Etre là pour les autres, j'ai décidé d'en faire mon métier. » Portée par nos 32 000 collaborateurs, notre campagne de communication employeur souligne ce qui nous rassemble et nous rend fiers au quotidien : notre métier, le point de départ de belles histoires, humain...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Léons







Groupama






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Léons in 2026.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Groupama in 2026.
Incident History - Léons (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Léons cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Groupama (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Groupama cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Léons

Groupama
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.