Comparison Overview

MNG Kargo - a company of DHL

VS

A.P. Moller - Maersk

MNG Kargo - a company of DHL

Ayazağa Mahallesi Azerbaycan Caddesi, Sarıyer, 34396, TR
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.mngkargo.com.tr

2003 yılında kurulan MNG Kargo, 850’den fazla şubesi, 9 tanesi Teknolojik Aktarma Merkezi olmak üzere toplam 29 aktarma merkezi, 21 minihub, 14 bölge müdürlüğü, 10.000’in üzerinde çalışanı ve 4.100’den fazla kara taşıma aracı ile hizmet vermektedir. MNG Kargo, Türkiye’nin bir ucundan diğer ucuna ve dünyada 220 farklı ülkede, günde 600 binden fazla adrese dünya standartlarında hizmet ulaştıran Türkiye’nin lider kargo şirketlerindendir. Sektörde ilk Teknolojik Aktarma Merkezlerine sahip kargo şirketi olan MNG Kargo, bu teknoloji sayesinde saatte 65 bin kargoyu yüksek hızda ayrıştırıp, el değmeden hatasız olarak hat araçlarına yükleyerek, hasarsız teslimat sağlamaktadır. Türkiye’de kargo taşımacılığı sektörünün gelişiminde başrol oynayan, dünya standartlarındaki hizmet anlayışı ile ülkemiz taşımacılık sektörüne çağdaş dinamikler kazandırmış olan MNG Kargo yatırımları ile güçlenmeye ve taşımacılık sektörüne değer katmaya devam etmektedir.

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 2,618
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Esplanaden 50, None, Copenhagen, None, DK, 1098
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 800 and 849
http://www.maersk.com

A.P. Moller - Maersk is an integrated transport and logistics company; going all the way, together, for our customers and society. ALL THE WAY is our commitment to connect the world so that everyone has both the possibility and the ability to trade, grow and thrive. The company employs roughly 110.000 employees across operations in 130 countries.

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 79,448
Subsidiaries: 17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mngkargo.jpeg
MNG Kargo - a company of DHL
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maersk-group.jpeg
A.P. Moller - Maersk
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MNG Kargo - a company of DHL
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
A.P. Moller - Maersk
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MNG Kargo - a company of DHL in 2025.

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A.P. Moller - Maersk in 2025.

Incident History — MNG Kargo - a company of DHL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MNG Kargo - a company of DHL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — A.P. Moller - Maersk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A.P. Moller - Maersk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mngkargo.jpeg
MNG Kargo - a company of DHL
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2021
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Phishing, Credential Theft
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maersk-group.jpeg
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malware (NotPetya), Supply Chain Compromise (via Ukrainian accounting software M.E.Doc), Lateral Movement
Motivation: Geopolitical (targeting Ukraine), Collateral Damage (global spread), Disruption of Critical Infrastructure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Compromised Software Updates (NotPetya via Ukrainian accounting software), Phishing/Social Engineering, Outdated/Poorly Maintained Systems, Third-Party Vendor Vulnerabilities, GNSS Jamming/Spoofing (Russia, Iran, China), AI-Assisted Exploits (e.g., subverting AI assistants), Manual Override of Digital Systems (human error)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Ransomware), Geopolitical Disruption (State Actors), Espionage (Strategic Maritime Data), Hacktivism (e.g., Lab-Dookhtegan), Operational Sabotage (e.g., GNSS Interference)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Compromised Software Update, Backdoor in M.E.Doc
Motivation: Geopolitical Disruption, Targeting Ukraine (Maersk as collateral damage)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

A.P. Moller - Maersk company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MNG Kargo - a company of DHL company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

A.P. Moller - Maersk company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to MNG Kargo - a company of DHL company.

In the current year, A.P. Moller - Maersk company and MNG Kargo - a company of DHL company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither A.P. Moller - Maersk company nor MNG Kargo - a company of DHL company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither A.P. Moller - Maersk company nor MNG Kargo - a company of DHL company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

A.P. Moller - Maersk company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while MNG Kargo - a company of DHL company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither MNG Kargo - a company of DHL company nor A.P. Moller - Maersk company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MNG Kargo - a company of DHL nor A.P. Moller - Maersk holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

A.P. Moller - Maersk company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to MNG Kargo - a company of DHL company.

A.P. Moller - Maersk company employs more people globally than MNG Kargo - a company of DHL company, reflecting its scale as a Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage.

Neither MNG Kargo - a company of DHL nor A.P. Moller - Maersk holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MNG Kargo - a company of DHL nor A.P. Moller - Maersk holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MNG Kargo - a company of DHL nor A.P. Moller - Maersk holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MNG Kargo - a company of DHL nor A.P. Moller - Maersk holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MNG Kargo - a company of DHL nor A.P. Moller - Maersk holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MNG Kargo - a company of DHL nor A.P. Moller - Maersk holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References