Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Minnesota Board of AELSLAGIDMinnesota Board of AELSLAGID
VS
State of MichiganState of Michigan
Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID

Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID

85 E. 7th Place STE 160, St. Paul, 55101-2333, US

Last Update: 12/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://mn.gov/aelslagid
758/1000Fair

The mission of the Minnesota Board is to protect the public health, safety and welfare by: * Ensuring that those entering the professional practice of architecture, engineering, land surveying, landscape architecture, geology, soil science, or those using the title o...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:10
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
State of Michigan

State of Michigan

State Capitol, Lansing, Michigan, US, 48913

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
789/1000Fair

Every day the contributions and achievements of State of Michigan employees have a direct impact on over 10 million Michiganders across the state. If you're looking for a fulfilling career in state government that can make a real difference in the lives of others, you c...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:35,704
Subsidiaries:43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID

Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
State of Michigan

State of Michigan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Michigan in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - State of Michigan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Michigan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID

Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
State of Michigan

State of Michigan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID company and State of Michigan company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID company and State of Michigan company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID company and State of Michigan company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID company and State of Michigan company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID company and State of Michigan company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID and State of Michigan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID and State of Michigan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID or State of Michigan ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID or State of Michigan ?
Between Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID and State of Michigan, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Minnesota Board of AELSLAGID and State of Michigan, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8