Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Minnesota Office of the State AuditorMinnesota Office of the State Auditor
VS
Baker Tilly USBaker Tilly US
Minnesota Office of the State Auditor

Minnesota Office of the State Auditor

525 Park Street, St. Paul, 55103, US

Last Update: 11/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.osa.state.mn.us
752/1000Fair

The Office of the State Auditor serves the public by ensuring accountability and transparency in local government with independent and unbiased oversight. We set the bar for quality audit standards and provide technical assistance to local governments. We prioritize a...

NAICS:5412
NAICS Definition:Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Employees:59
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Baker Tilly US

Baker Tilly US

205 N. Michigan Ave., Chicago, 60601, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bakertilly.com
772/1000Fair

Baker Tilly is a leading advisory, tax and assurance firm, providing clients with a genuine coast-to-coast and global advantage in major regions of the U.S. and in many of the world’s leading financial centers – New York, London, San Francisco, Seattle, Los Angeles, Chi...

NAICS:5412
NAICS Definition:Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Employees:10,396
Subsidiaries:39
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Minnesota Office of the State Auditor

Minnesota Office of the State Auditor

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Baker Tilly US

Baker Tilly US

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Accounting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minnesota Office of the State Auditor in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Accounting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baker Tilly US in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Minnesota Office of the State Auditor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minnesota Office of the State Auditor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Baker Tilly US (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baker Tilly US cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Minnesota Office of the State Auditor

Minnesota Office of the State Auditor

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Baker Tilly US

Baker Tilly US

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Minnesota Office of the State Auditor company and Baker Tilly US company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Minnesota Office of the State Auditor company and Baker Tilly US company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Minnesota Office of the State Auditor company and Baker Tilly US company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Minnesota Office of the State Auditor company and Baker Tilly US company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Minnesota Office of the State Auditor company and Baker Tilly US company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Minnesota Office of the State Auditor company and Baker Tilly US company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Minnesota Office of the State Auditor company and Baker Tilly US company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Minnesota Office of the State Auditor company and Baker Tilly US company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Minnesota Office of the State Auditor company and Baker Tilly US company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Minnesota Office of the State Auditor company and Baker Tilly US company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Minnesota Office of the State Auditor company and Baker Tilly US company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Minnesota Office of the State Auditor and Baker Tilly US, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Minnesota Office of the State Auditor and Baker Tilly US, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Minnesota Office of the State Auditor or Baker Tilly US ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Minnesota Office of the State Auditor or Baker Tilly US ?
Between Minnesota Office of the State Auditor and Baker Tilly US, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Minnesota Office of the State Auditor and Baker Tilly US, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8