Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Minnesota Department of CommerceMinnesota Department of Commerce
VS
ISSSTEISSSTE
Minnesota Department of Commerce

Minnesota Department of Commerce

85 7th Pl E, St Paul, 55101, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://mn.gov/commerce
761/1000Fair

For 150+ years, @MNCommerce has overseen more than 40 industries to protect consumer interests and ensure a fair and competitive marketplace in Minnesota. Whether you’re filling up on gas, purchasing a home, working to reduce energy consumption, or rebuilding after a di...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:233
Subsidiaries:58
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ISSSTE

ISSSTE

MX

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.com
849/1000Good

INSTITUTO DE SEGURIDAD Y SERVICIOS SOCIALES DE LOS TRABAJADORES DEL ESTADO. ES UN ORGANISMOS PÚBLICO QUE OTORGA SERVICIOS DE SALUD, PENSIONES, VIVIENDA, PRÉSTAMOS, ESTANCIAS INFANTILES, TURISMO, CULTURA, RECREACION, DEPORTE; CUYOS AFILIADOS SON TRABAJADORES DE DEPENDEN...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:22,933
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Minnesota Department of Commerce

Minnesota Department of Commerce

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ISSSTE

ISSSTE

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minnesota Department of Commerce in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ISSSTE in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Minnesota Department of Commerce (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minnesota Department of Commerce cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ISSSTE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ISSSTE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Minnesota Department of Commerce

Minnesota Department of Commerce

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ISSSTE

ISSSTE

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Minnesota Department of Commerce company and ISSSTE company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Minnesota Department of Commerce company and ISSSTE company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Minnesota Department of Commerce company and ISSSTE company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Minnesota Department of Commerce company and ISSSTE company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Minnesota Department of Commerce company and ISSSTE company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Minnesota Department of Commerce company and ISSSTE company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Minnesota Department of Commerce company and ISSSTE company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Minnesota Department of Commerce company and ISSSTE company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Minnesota Department of Commerce company and ISSSTE company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Minnesota Department of Commerce company and ISSSTE company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Minnesota Department of Commerce company and ISSSTE company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Minnesota Department of Commerce and ISSSTE, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Minnesota Department of Commerce and ISSSTE, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Minnesota Department of Commerce or ISSSTE ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Minnesota Department of Commerce or ISSSTE ?
Between Minnesota Department of Commerce and ISSSTE, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Minnesota Department of Commerce and ISSSTE, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1