Comparison Overview
MLM Group

MLM Group
North Kiln, Felaw Maltings, 46 Felaw Street, Ipswich, Suffolk, GB, IP2 8PN
Last Update: 29/01/2026
On 1 April 2021 MLM Group, was rebranded to Sweco, a leading multi-disciplinary design, compliance and specialist practice operating across the UK and internationally, across four divisions - buildings, infrastructure, environmental consulting and compliance. To follow...

Tata Projects
14th - 15th Floor, Cignus, Mumbai, 400087, IN
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Tata Projects is one of the most admired Technology led Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) companies in India. We have expertise in providing sustainable solutions in the execution of large and complex urban and industrial infrastructure projects while also...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

MLM Group







Tata Projects






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for MLM Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tata Projects in 2026.
Incident History - MLM Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MLM Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Tata Projects (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tata Projects cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

MLM Group

Tata Projects
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.