Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MJ Hudson Regulatory SolutionsMJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions
VS
First AmericanFirst American
MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions

MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions

1 Frederick's Pl, London EC2R 8AE, UK, London, EC2R 8AE, GB

Last Update: 28/11/2025

View Profile

MJ Hudson’s Regulatory Solutions team serves the full spectrum of investment businesses in the UK and Europe. We have two core objectives: 1. Business friendly: We are here to help you navigate regulatory complexity and help you do business quickly and efficiently 2....

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
First American

First American

1 First American Way, Santa Ana, 92707, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.firstam.com
728/1000Moderate

First American Financial Corporation is a premier provider of title, settlement and risk solutions for real estate transactions. With its combination of financial strength and stability built over more than 130 years, innovative proprietary technologies, and unmatched d...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:15,634
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions

MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
First American

First American

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for First American in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - First American (X = Date, Y = Severity)

First American cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions

MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
First American

First American

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FIR713072525

FAQ

Between MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions company and First American company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions company and First American company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions company and First American company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions company and First American company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions company and First American company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions company and First American company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions company and First American company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions company and First American company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions company and First American company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions company and First American company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions company and First American company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions and First American, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions and First American, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions or First American ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions or First American ?
Between MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions and First American, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MJ Hudson Regulatory Solutions and First American, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA