Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Michigan Women’s CommissionMichigan Women’s Commission
VS
France TravailFrance Travail
Michigan Women’s Commission

Michigan Women’s Commission

undefined, Lansing, Michigan, 48933, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.michigan.gov/mwc
757/1000Fair

The Michigan Women’s Commission (MWC) was statutorily created in 1968 [PA 1 of 1968] with the mission of improving the lives of Michigan women. Throughout its forty-four year history, the MWC has worked on many issues. Its current priorities are unlocking opportunitie...

NAICS:922
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:9
Subsidiaries:43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
France Travail

France Travail

1, avenue du docteur Gley, Paris, FR, 75020

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
718/1000Moderate

France Travail est un acteur majeur du marché de l’emploi en France où il s’investit pour faciliter le retour à l’emploi des demandeurs d’emploi et offrir aux entreprises des réponses adaptées à leurs besoins de recrutement. Les 55 000 collaborateurs de France Travail...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:50,801
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Michigan Women’s Commission

Michigan Women’s Commission

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
France Travail

France Travail

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Michigan Women’s Commission in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for France Travail in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Michigan Women’s Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Michigan Women’s Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - France Travail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

France Travail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Michigan Women’s Commission

Michigan Women’s Commission

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
France Travail

France Travail

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FRA242072325
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FRA2692726102925
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
PLE3454923

FAQ

Between Michigan Women’s Commission company and France Travail company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Michigan Women’s Commission company and France Travail company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Michigan Women’s Commission company and France Travail company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Michigan Women’s Commission company and France Travail company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Michigan Women’s Commission company and France Travail company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Michigan Women’s Commission company and France Travail company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Michigan Women’s Commission company and France Travail company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Michigan Women’s Commission company and France Travail company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Michigan Women’s Commission company and France Travail company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Michigan Women’s Commission company and France Travail company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Michigan Women’s Commission company and France Travail company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Michigan Women’s Commission and France Travail, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Michigan Women’s Commission and France Travail, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Michigan Women’s Commission or France Travail ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Michigan Women’s Commission or France Travail ?
Between Michigan Women’s Commission and France Travail, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Michigan Women’s Commission and France Travail, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1