Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Michigan Veteran HomesMichigan Veteran Homes
VS
US Government Accountability OfficeUS Government Accountability Office
Michigan Veteran Homes

Michigan Veteran Homes

3411 N Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, Lansing, 48906, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.michigan.gov/mvh
759/1000Fair

Michigan Veteran Homes (MVH) is the administrative entity that operates the state’s veteran homes on behalf of the Michigan Veterans Facility Authority and is a branch of the Michigan Department of Military and Veteran Affairs. MVH strives to ensure that quality long-te...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:37
Subsidiaries:43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
US Government Accountability Office

US Government Accountability Office

441 G Street, N.W., Washington, 20548, US

Last Update: 28/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.gao.gov
674/1000Weak

For more information about GAO, please visit www.gao.gov. General Information The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) is an independent, nonpartisan agency that works for Congress. Often called the "congressional watchdog,"​ GAO investigates how the federal go...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:17,303
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Michigan Veteran Homes

Michigan Veteran Homes

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
US Government Accountability Office

US Government Accountability Office

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Michigan Veteran Homes in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

US Government Accountability Office has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Michigan Veteran Homes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Michigan Veteran Homes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - US Government Accountability Office (X = Date, Y = Severity)

US Government Accountability Office cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Michigan Veteran Homes

Michigan Veteran Homes

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
US Government Accountability Office

US Government Accountability Office

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
US-1790619948
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
US-1773483893
🔒 Incident : Breach
US-FOR1772821514

FAQ

Between Michigan Veteran Homes company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Michigan Veteran Homes company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Michigan Veteran Homes company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Michigan Veteran Homes company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Michigan Veteran Homes company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Michigan Veteran Homes company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Michigan Veteran Homes company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Michigan Veteran Homes company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Michigan Veteran Homes company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Michigan Veteran Homes company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Michigan Veteran Homes company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Michigan Veteran Homes and US Government Accountability Office, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Michigan Veteran Homes and US Government Accountability Office, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Michigan Veteran Homes or US Government Accountability Office ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Michigan Veteran Homes or US Government Accountability Office ?
Between Michigan Veteran Homes and US Government Accountability Office, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Michigan Veteran Homes and US Government Accountability Office, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA