Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Mittelbrandenburgische SparkasseMittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse
VS
Tata CapitalTata Capital
Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse

Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse

N/A

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.mbs.de
756/1000Fair

Ihre MBS: Die moderne und leistungsfähige Sparkasse in Ihrer Nähe mit umfangreichem Service im Internet, flächendeckendem Filialnetz und ausgezeichneter Beratung. Ob Kontoführung, Geldanlage oder Unternehmensfinanzierung – mit unseren über 1.400 Mitarbeitern und über 1...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:327
Subsidiaries:60
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tata Capital

Tata Capital

Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Mumbai, 400013, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.tatacapital.com
802/1000Good

Tata Capital Limited is a subsidiary of Tata Sons Limited. The Company is registered with the Reserve Bank of India as a Core Investment Company and offers through itself and its subsidiaries fund and fee-based financial services to its customers, under the Tata Capital...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:24,293
Subsidiaries:68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse

Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tata Capital

Tata Capital

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Capital in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tata Capital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Capital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse

Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tata Capital

Tata Capital

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse company and Tata Capital company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse company and Tata Capital company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse company and Tata Capital company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse company and Tata Capital company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse company and Tata Capital company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse company and Tata Capital company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse company and Tata Capital company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse company and Tata Capital company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse company and Tata Capital company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse company and Tata Capital company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse company and Tata Capital company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse and Tata Capital, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse and Tata Capital, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse or Tata Capital ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse or Tata Capital ?
Between Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse and Tata Capital, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Mittelbrandenburgische Sparkasse and Tata Capital, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2