Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA")Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA")
VS
Marubeni CorporationMarubeni Corporation
Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA")

Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA")

200 Park Avenue, New York, 10166, US

Last Update: 23/01/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

With a long history in the United States, Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. (“Mitsui USA”) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Mitsui & Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, one of the most diversified and comprehensive trading, investment, and service enterprises in the world. Mitsui & Co. p...

NAICS:522293
NAICS Definition:International Trade Financing
Employees:221
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Marubeni Corporation

Marubeni Corporation

4-2, Ohtemachi 1-chome, Chiyoda-ku, 1008088, JP

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.marubeni.com/en
816/1000Good

Marubeni Corporation (TSE securities code: 8002) is one of Japan’s largest trading companies (sogo shosha) with more than 165 years of history. Headquartered in Tokyo, Marubeni continues to expand its businesses across the globe, with 130 branches and offices worldwide....

NAICS:522293
NAICS Definition:International Trade Financing
Employees:10,224
Subsidiaries:38
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA")

Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA")

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Marubeni Corporation

Marubeni Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs International Trade and Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA") in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs International Trade and Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marubeni Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA") (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA") cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Marubeni Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marubeni Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA")

Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA")

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Marubeni Corporation

Marubeni Corporation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA") company and Marubeni Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA") company and Marubeni Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA") company and Marubeni Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA") company and Marubeni Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA") company and Marubeni Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA") company and Marubeni Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA") company and Marubeni Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA") company and Marubeni Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA") company and Marubeni Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA") company and Marubeni Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA") company and Marubeni Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA") and Marubeni Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA") and Marubeni Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA") or Marubeni Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA") or Marubeni Corporation ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA") and Marubeni Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. | ("Mitsui USA") and Marubeni Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66591
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in David Lingren Media LIbrary Assistant allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Media LIbrary Assistant: from n/a through 3.39.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-66589
SUMMARY

Missing Authorization vulnerability in Kings Plugins B2BKing allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects B2BKing: from n/a through 5.2.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-27365
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in PublishPress PublishPress Series allows Stored XSS. This issue affects PublishPress Series: from n/a through 2.17.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-73974
SUMMARY

linuxfabrik-lib provides Python modules for database access, caching, shell execution, and API integrations, and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins uses its shared testing helper across check plugins. Prior to linuxfabrik-lib 6.1.0 and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins 7.0.0, lib.lftest.test() treated the first or second element of a --test CSV argument as a filesystem path and returned the file contents as simulated standard output or standard error without path confinement. The hidden but production-accessible --test argument was accepted by sudo-authorized plugins, so an attacker controlling the nagios or icinga account could use check-plugins/deb-updates/deb-updates with its default QUERY=1 to disclose every line of a root-readable file. Approximately 22 other plugins exposed filtered content or a root file existence and readability oracle through the same helper, while check-plugins/network-bonding/network-bonding and check-plugins/openstack-swift-stat/openstack-swift-stat had direct read paths that bypassed the helper. The library fix confines fixture reads to the invoking plugin's unit-test directory and refuses unsafe anchors, and the plugin fix routes the two bypasses through that helper. These issues are fixed in linuxfabrik-lib 6.1.0 and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins 7.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-73973
SUMMARY

Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins provides monitoring plugins for Icinga, Nagios, and related systems. Prior to version 7.0.0, check-plugins/logfile/logfile accepted a free-form --filename path and opened it as root when invoked through the shipped nagios or icinga sudoers allowlist, without confining the resolved path to /var/log. An attacker who controls the monitoring account can select a root-readable file such as /etc/shadow and use --warning-regex . while leaving SUPPRESS_OUTPUT false, causing each nonempty line to be collected in warn_matches and returned through lib.base.oao(). The vulnerable flow passes the expanded scan_path directly to open(), and neither real-path containment nor an allowlist protects the sink. The same fix also confines mysql-logfile and openvpn-client-list paths, allows only documented log roots, and resolves symlinks and parent-directory traversal before checking containment. This issue is fixed in version 7.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8