Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd.Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd.
VS
IntertekIntertek
Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd.

Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd.

12 Marina View, #31-01 Asia Square Tower 2, Singapore 018961, Singapore , 018961, SG

Last Update: 04/01/2026

View Profile

Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) is the regional headquarters for Mitsui & Co., one of the world's most diversified trading, investment and services enterprises. Based in Singapore, we oversee operations in 15 countries and 27 cities across Southwest Asia, Southeast Asia, ...

NAICS:522293
NAICS Definition:International Trade Financing
Employees:207
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Intertek

Intertek

33 Cavendish Square, London, W1G 0PS, GB

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.intertek.com
785/1000Fair

Intertek is a leading Total Quality Assurance provider to industries worldwide. Our network of more than 1,000 laboratories and offices in more than 100 countries, delivers innovative and bespoke Assurance, Testing, Inspection and Certification solutions for our custom...

NAICS:522293
NAICS Definition:International Trade Financing
Employees:30,364
Subsidiaries:25
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd.

Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Intertek

Intertek

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs International Trade and Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs International Trade and Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intertek in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Intertek (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intertek cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd.

Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Intertek

Intertek

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. company and Intertek company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. company and Intertek company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. company and Intertek company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. company and Intertek company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. company and Intertek company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. company and Intertek company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. company and Intertek company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. company and Intertek company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. company and Intertek company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. company and Intertek company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. company and Intertek company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. and Intertek, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. and Intertek, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. or Intertek ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. or Intertek ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. and Intertek, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Mitsui & Co. (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. and Intertek, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3