Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Mitsubishi Electric TürkiyeMitsubishi Electric Türkiye
VS
HaierHaier
Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye

Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye

Mitsubishi Electric Turkey A.Ş. , İstanbul, 34775, TR

Last Update: 22/02/2026

View Profile
750/1000Fair

Mitsubishi Electric Corporation 100 yılı aşkın tecrübesi ve 150 bine yakın çalışanı ile 120’nin üzerinde ülkede faaliyet gösteren Mitsubishi Electric Corporation; uzay sistemleri, ulaşım sistemleri, enerji sistemleri, yarı iletkenler ve cihazlar, bilgi ve iletişim sist...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:286
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Haier

Haier

1 Haier Rd, Laoshan District., Qingdao, 266103, CN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.haier.com
776/1000Fair

Established in 1984, Haier Group is a world-leading provider of solutions to better life. Focusing on user experience, Haier has been included on the list of BrandZ™ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands for two consecutive years as the world’s first and only IoT ecosyste...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:18,744
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye

Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Haier

Haier

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Haier in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Haier (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Haier cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye

Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Haier

Haier

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye company and Haier company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye company and Haier company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye company and Haier company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye company and Haier company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye company and Haier company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye company and Haier company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye company and Haier company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye company and Haier company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye company and Haier company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye company and Haier company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye company and Haier company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye and Haier, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye and Haier, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye or Haier ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye or Haier ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye and Haier, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric Türkiye and Haier, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9