Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Mitsubishi ElectricMitsubishi Electric
VS
Midea GroupMidea Group
Mitsubishi Electric

Mitsubishi Electric

Marunochi, 2-7-3, Chiyoda-ku, 100-8310, JP

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
745/1000Moderate

The Mitsubishi Electric Group’s corporate mission is to continually improve its technologies and services by applying creativity to all aspects of its business. By doing so, we enhance the quality of life in our society. Mitsubishi Electric has established itself as a l...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:6,644
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3
Midea Group

Midea Group

6 Midea Avenue, Foshan, Guangdong, CN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.midea-group.com/
783/1000Fair

Midea Group aspires to the vision of “Bringing Great Innovations to Life”, upholding the Founders’ philosophy of creating a better life through technology. Midea Group has evolved into a global leading technology company specializing in six major businesses including Sm...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:18,947
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Mitsubishi Electric

Mitsubishi Electric

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Midea Group

Midea Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Mitsubishi Electric has 45.65% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Midea Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Mitsubishi Electric (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mitsubishi Electric cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Midea Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Midea Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Mitsubishi Electric

Mitsubishi Electric

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MIT1770021852
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
MIT11629523
🔒 Incident : Breach
MIT2023111222
Midea Group

Midea Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Mitsubishi Electric company and Midea Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric company and Midea Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric company and Midea Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric company and Midea Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric company and Midea Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric company and Midea Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric company and Midea Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric company and Midea Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric company and Midea Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric company and Midea Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric company and Midea Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric and Midea Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric and Midea Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Mitsubishi Electric or Midea Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Mitsubishi Electric or Midea Group ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric and Midea Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Mitsubishi Electric and Midea Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA