Comparison Overview
Mitsubishi Electric

Mitsubishi Electric
Marunochi, 2-7-3, Chiyoda-ku, 100-8310, JP
Last Update: 29/03/2026
The Mitsubishi Electric Group’s corporate mission is to continually improve its technologies and services by applying creativity to all aspects of its business. By doing so, we enhance the quality of life in our society. Mitsubishi Electric has established itself as a l...

Foxconn
US
Last Update: 18/06/2026
Established in Taiwan in 1974, Hon Hai Technology Group (Foxconn) (2317: Taiwan) is the world’s largest electronics manufacturer. Foxconn is also the leading technological solution provider, and it continuously leverages its expertise in software and hardware to integra...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Mitsubishi Electric







Foxconn






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Mitsubishi Electric has 44.75% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Foxconn has 288.35% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Mitsubishi Electric (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mitsubishi Electric cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Foxconn (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Foxconn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Mitsubishi Electric

Foxconn
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.
A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service
PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.