Comparison Overview
Mitsubishi Electric

Mitsubishi Electric
Marunochi, 2-7-3, Chiyoda-ku, 100-8310, JP
Last Update: 29/03/2026
The Mitsubishi Electric Group’s corporate mission is to continually improve its technologies and services by applying creativity to all aspects of its business. By doing so, we enhance the quality of life in our society. Mitsubishi Electric has established itself as a l...

Delta Electronics
瑞光路, 內湖區, 114, TW
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Delta is a global innovative provider of switching power supplies and DC brushless fans, as well as a major source for power management solutions, components, visual displays, industrial automation, networking products, and renewable energy solutions. Delta Group has sa...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Mitsubishi Electric







Delta Electronics






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Mitsubishi Electric has 48.45% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Delta Electronics has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Mitsubishi Electric (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mitsubishi Electric cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Delta Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Delta Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Mitsubishi Electric

Delta Electronics
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.