MEIDS A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
MEIDS
Company Information
Website:https://iconics.com
Employees number:248
Number of followers:9,602
NAICS:5112
Industry Type:Software Development
Homepage:iconics.com
MEIDS Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 750 and 799
MEIDSSoftware Development
Updated:
01/04/2026
01/04/2026
751/1000
Fair
Baa
MEIDS Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
MEIDSSoftware Development
Score locked
MEIDSFair
Current Score
751Baa (FAIR)
01000
1 incidents
-2 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JULY 2026
752
JUNE 2026
752
MAY 2026
752
APRIL 2026
752
MARCH 2026
751
FEBRUARY 2026
751
JANUARY 2026
751
DECEMBER 2025
753
Vulnerability
29 Dec 2025 • MEIDS
Moxa, Siemens, Hitachi Energy and Mitsubishi Electric: Team Cymru warns exposed ICS and OT devices targeted by nation-state actors raise industrial, critical infrastructure risks
Exposed ICS/OT Devices Under Nation-State Threat: Key Findings from Team Cymru’s Research
751
CRITICAL-2
SIEMOXMITHIT1774866497
Exposed ICS/OT Devices Under Nation-State Threat: Key Findings from Team Cymru’s Research
Team Cymru’s latest research reveals alarming vulnerabilities in industrial control systems (ICS) and operational technology (OT) environments, highlighting how exposed devices remain prime targets for hostile nation-state actors. The report examines three case studies demonstrating the persistent risks to critical infrastructure, driven by poor security practices and active exploitation campaigns.
### Case Study 1: Destructive Attack on Polish Power Grid
In December 2025, the Russian-linked Dragonfly group targeted Poland’s power grid by exploiting Hitachi RTU560 remote terminal units critical for electrical grid stability. Attackers leveraged default credentials on internet-exposed web interfaces, a common but preventable weakness. Once inside, they deployed a "hard brick" attack, uploading corrupted firmware that forced devices into an infinite reboot loop, rendering them inoperable. While the immediate impact was limited to communication disruptions, the attack demonstrated how basic access vectors could escalate into broader infrastructure degradation.
### Case Study 2: Moxa NPort Devices Compromised via Default Credentials
The same Dragonfly campaign also targeted Moxa NPort devices, which bridge legacy serial equipment with modern IP networks. Despite supporting secure protocols like TLS and SSH, many devices remained vulnerable due to unrotated factory-default logins. Attackers gained administrative access, reset devices to factory settings, and reconfigured IP addresses to 127.0.0.1, effectively cutting them off from the network. Recovery required manual intervention, causing prolonged operational downtime.
### Case Study 3: Rockwell Automation Vulnerabilities Enable Remote Exploitation
In July 2023, Rockwell Automation and CISA disclosed critical vulnerabilities (CVE-2023-3595, CVE-2023-3596) in Allen-Bradley ControlLogix communication modules. These flaws, attributed to a nation-state actor, allowed remote code execution via maliciously crafted Common Industrial Protocol (CIP) messages. Security firm Dragos compared the threat to TRISIS/TRITON-level attacks, noting that compromised modules could manipulate process data, maintain persistence, and evade detection potentially leading to catastrophic failures without operator awareness.
### Exposure Landscape: Key Statistics
Team Cymru’s data reveals a troubling concentration of exposed devices:
- Rockwell Automation dominates with 68.1% (6,653 unique IPs) of detected targets, reflecting its widespread use in North American and global industrial automation.
- Moxa accounts for 15.7% (1,532 IPs), with attackers leveraging its networking equipment to pivot deeper into OT networks.
- Other major vendors include Siemens (7.3%), Schneider Electric (4.5%), Hitachi Energy (4.2%), and Mitsubishi Electric (0.1%), all critical to European and Asian infrastructure.
Geographically, the U.S. leads with 45.4% of exposed devices (1,269 IPs), a concern given Dragonfly and Volt Typhoon’s history of pre-positioning in critical sectors. Russia (4.3%), Ukraine (3.0%), and Taiwan (2.6%) also rank high, reflecting ongoing cyber warfare and geopolitical tensions.
### Broader Implications
The research underscores a critical gap in ICS/OT security: thousands of devices remain internet-exposed despite best practices advising against direct public access. The persistence of default credentials, unpatched vulnerabilities, and nation-state reconnaissance efforts signals an urgent need for improved IT/OT convergence and proactive threat mitigation. Without intervention, these exposures risk enabling disruptive or destructive attacks on essential services.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
REFERENCES
NOVEMBER 2025
753
OCTOBER 2025
753
SEPTEMBER 2025
753
AUGUST 2025
753
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for MEIDS ??
What was MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ??
What was MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What was MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ??
What was MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with MEIDS ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view MEIDS's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?