Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions

Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

iconics.com

Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions (MEIDS), headquartered in Foxborough, Massachusetts, is a global leader in industrial automation, smart and sustainable buildings, and digitalization software. Our advanced HMI, SCADA, and Smart Building solutions enable businesses to visualize, monitor, and optimize their most critical assets and spaces. With installations in over 100 countries and adoption by more than 70% of Global 500 companies, MEIDS drives operational efficiency and continuous improvement across industrial manufacturing, infrastructure, and built environment sectors. Backed by cutting-edge technology and deep industry expertise, we deliver flexible, scalable, and high-performance software solutions. As a testament to our


MEIDS A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

MEIDS
Company Information
Website:https://iconics.com
Employees number:248
Number of followers:9,602
NAICS:5112
Industry Type:Software Development
Homepage:iconics.com
MEIDS Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 750 and 799
logo
MEIDSSoftware Development
Updated:
01/04/2026
751/1000
Fair
Baa
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
MEIDS Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
MEIDSSoftware Development
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

MEIDS
MEIDSFair
Current Score
751Baa (FAIR)
01000
1 incidents
-2 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JULY 2026
752Before Incident
JUNE 2026
752Before Incident
MAY 2026
752Before Incident
APRIL 2026
752Before Incident
MARCH 2026
751Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
751Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
751Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
753Before Incident
Vulnerability
29 Dec 2025MEIDS
Moxa, Siemens, Hitachi Energy and Mitsubishi Electric: Team Cymru warns exposed ICS and OT devices targeted by nation-state actors raise industrial, critical infrastructure risks

Exposed ICS/OT Devices Under Nation-State Threat: Key Findings from Team Cymru’s Research

751After Incident
CRITICAL-2
SIEMOXMITHIT1774866497
Exposed ICS/OT Devices Under Nation-State Threat: Key Findings from Team Cymru’s Research Team Cymru’s latest research reveals alarming vulnerabilities in industrial control systems (ICS) and operational technology (OT) environments, highlighting how exposed devices remain prime targets for hostile nation-state actors. The report examines three case studies demonstrating the persistent risks to critical infrastructure, driven by poor security practices and active exploitation campaigns. ### Case Study 1: Destructive Attack on Polish Power Grid In December 2025, the Russian-linked Dragonfly group targeted Poland’s power grid by exploiting Hitachi RTU560 remote terminal units critical for electrical grid stability. Attackers leveraged default credentials on internet-exposed web interfaces, a common but preventable weakness. Once inside, they deployed a "hard brick" attack, uploading corrupted firmware that forced devices into an infinite reboot loop, rendering them inoperable. While the immediate impact was limited to communication disruptions, the attack demonstrated how basic access vectors could escalate into broader infrastructure degradation. ### Case Study 2: Moxa NPort Devices Compromised via Default Credentials The same Dragonfly campaign also targeted Moxa NPort devices, which bridge legacy serial equipment with modern IP networks. Despite supporting secure protocols like TLS and SSH, many devices remained vulnerable due to unrotated factory-default logins. Attackers gained administrative access, reset devices to factory settings, and reconfigured IP addresses to 127.0.0.1, effectively cutting them off from the network. Recovery required manual intervention, causing prolonged operational downtime. ### Case Study 3: Rockwell Automation Vulnerabilities Enable Remote Exploitation In July 2023, Rockwell Automation and CISA disclosed critical vulnerabilities (CVE-2023-3595, CVE-2023-3596) in Allen-Bradley ControlLogix communication modules. These flaws, attributed to a nation-state actor, allowed remote code execution via maliciously crafted Common Industrial Protocol (CIP) messages. Security firm Dragos compared the threat to TRISIS/TRITON-level attacks, noting that compromised modules could manipulate process data, maintain persistence, and evade detection potentially leading to catastrophic failures without operator awareness. ### Exposure Landscape: Key Statistics Team Cymru’s data reveals a troubling concentration of exposed devices: - Rockwell Automation dominates with 68.1% (6,653 unique IPs) of detected targets, reflecting its widespread use in North American and global industrial automation. - Moxa accounts for 15.7% (1,532 IPs), with attackers leveraging its networking equipment to pivot deeper into OT networks. - Other major vendors include Siemens (7.3%), Schneider Electric (4.5%), Hitachi Energy (4.2%), and Mitsubishi Electric (0.1%), all critical to European and Asian infrastructure. Geographically, the U.S. leads with 45.4% of exposed devices (1,269 IPs), a concern given Dragonfly and Volt Typhoon’s history of pre-positioning in critical sectors. Russia (4.3%), Ukraine (3.0%), and Taiwan (2.6%) also rank high, reflecting ongoing cyber warfare and geopolitical tensions. ### Broader Implications The research underscores a critical gap in ICS/OT security: thousands of devices remain internet-exposed despite best practices advising against direct public access. The persistence of default credentials, unpatched vulnerabilities, and nation-state reconnaissance efforts signals an urgent need for improved IT/OT convergence and proactive threat mitigation. Without intervention, these exposures risk enabling disruptive or destructive attacks on essential services.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Cyber EspionageSabotageRemote Code Execution
MOTIVATION
Disruption of Critical InfrastructureCyber WarfareGeopolitical Tensions
IMPACT
Hitachi RTU560Moxa NPortAllen-Bradley ControlLogixDowntime: Prolonged operational downtime due to manual recoveryCommunication disruptionsInfinite reboot loopsNetwork isolationProcess data manipulation
NOVEMBER 2025
753Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
753Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
753Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
753Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for MEIDS ?
?
What was MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on MEIDS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with MEIDS ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view MEIDS's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?