Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Mitchell Lewis & StaverMitchell Lewis & Staver
VS
Keysight TechnologiesKeysight Technologies
Mitchell Lewis & Staver

Mitchell Lewis & Staver

9939 SW Commerce Cir., Wilsonville, 97070, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.mitchellewis.com
723/1000Moderate

Mitchell Lewis & Staver is the premiere value-added integrator of high quality pumps and motors, booster stations and custom applications. We are OEMs for UL listed electrical controls, including soft start systems and Variable Frequency Drives (VFDs) used in moving wat...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:108
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Keysight Technologies

Keysight Technologies

1400 Fountaingrove Pkwy, Santa Rosa, California, US, 95403

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.keysight.com
806/1000Good

Keysight empowers innovators to explore, design, and bring world-changing technologies to life. As the industry’s premier global innovation partner, Keysight’s software-centric solutions serve engineers across the design and development environment, enabling them to del...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:13,289
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Mitchell Lewis & Staver

Mitchell Lewis & Staver

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Keysight Technologies

Keysight Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mitchell Lewis & Staver in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Keysight Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Mitchell Lewis & Staver (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mitchell Lewis & Staver cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Keysight Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Keysight Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Mitchell Lewis & Staver

Mitchell Lewis & Staver

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MIT136080525
Keysight Technologies

Keysight Technologies

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Mitchell Lewis & Staver company and Keysight Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Mitchell Lewis & Staver company and Keysight Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Mitchell Lewis & Staver company and Keysight Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Mitchell Lewis & Staver company and Keysight Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Mitchell Lewis & Staver company and Keysight Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Mitchell Lewis & Staver company and Keysight Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Mitchell Lewis & Staver company and Keysight Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Mitchell Lewis & Staver company and Keysight Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Mitchell Lewis & Staver company and Keysight Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Mitchell Lewis & Staver company and Keysight Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Mitchell Lewis & Staver company and Keysight Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Mitchell Lewis & Staver and Keysight Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Mitchell Lewis & Staver and Keysight Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Mitchell Lewis & Staver or Keysight Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Mitchell Lewis & Staver or Keysight Technologies ?
Between Mitchell Lewis & Staver and Keysight Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Mitchell Lewis & Staver and Keysight Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA