Comparison Overview
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Massachusetts Institute of Technology
77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, 02139-4307, US
Last Update: 10/03/2026
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) is a private research university located in Cambridge, Massachusetts. MIT is devoted to the advancement of knowledge and education of students in areas that contribute to or prosper in an environment of science and techno...

George Mason University
4400 University Drive, Fairfax, Virginia , US, 22030
Last Update: 02/04/2026
George Mason University is Virginia’s largest and most diverse public research university. Located near Washington, D.C., Mason enrolls more than 40,000 students from 130 countries and 50 states, and has a residential population of more than 6,000 students. Mason has gr...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Massachusetts Institute of Technology







George Mason University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for George Mason University in 2026.
Incident History - Massachusetts Institute of Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - George Mason University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
George Mason University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

George Mason University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.