Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MIPSMIPS
VS
Samsung SemiconductorSamsung Semiconductor
MIPS

MIPS

2870 Zanker Rd, 210, San Jose, California, US, 95134

Last Update: 08/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.mips.com
717/1000Moderate

MIPS is accelerating compute density in the automotive, cloud and embedded markets. Giving customers the freedom to build unique products for specific workloads, MIPS’ industry-leading cores are configurable, efficient and easy to implement. Its multi-threading methodol...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:748
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Samsung Semiconductor

Samsung Semiconductor

N/A

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
704/1000Moderate

Established in 1974 as a subsidiary of Samsung Electronics, we’re proud to be recognized as one of the leading chip manufacturers in the world. Using our knowledge in semiconductor technology, our ambition is to spark the imagination of device manufacturers with top-of-...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:10,013
Subsidiaries:37
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MIPS

MIPS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Samsung Semiconductor

Samsung Semiconductor

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MIPS in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Samsung Semiconductor has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - MIPS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MIPS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Samsung Semiconductor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Samsung Semiconductor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MIPS

MIPS

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MIP337072825
Samsung Semiconductor

Samsung Semiconductor

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
APPADV1771962047
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
SAM2902029091525

FAQ

Between MIPS company and Samsung Semiconductor company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MIPS company and Samsung Semiconductor company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MIPS company and Samsung Semiconductor company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MIPS company and Samsung Semiconductor company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MIPS company and Samsung Semiconductor company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MIPS company and Samsung Semiconductor company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MIPS company and Samsung Semiconductor company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MIPS company and Samsung Semiconductor company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MIPS company and Samsung Semiconductor company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MIPS company and Samsung Semiconductor company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MIPS company and Samsung Semiconductor company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MIPS and Samsung Semiconductor, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MIPS and Samsung Semiconductor, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MIPS or Samsung Semiconductor ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MIPS or Samsung Semiconductor ?
Between MIPS and Samsung Semiconductor, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MIPS and Samsung Semiconductor, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA