Comparison Overview
Mint Digital Services

Mint Digital Services
Bellariastrasse 82, Zurich, 8038, CH
Last Update: 23/02/2026
Mint Digital Services is one of the forerunners in global digital music administration. On behalf of collective management organizations, independent management entities, songwriters, composers and publishers Mint administers agreements with digital music services and o...

Spotify
Regeringsgatan 19, Stockholm, Stockholm County, SE
Last Update: 01/09/2026
Our mission is to unlock the potential of human creativity—by giving a million creative artists the opportunity to live off their art and billions of fans the opportunity to enjoy and be inspired by it. Spotify transformed music listening forever when it launched in S...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Mint Digital Services







Spotify






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Musicians Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Mint Digital Services in 2026.
Incidents vs Musicians Industry Avg (This Year)
Spotify has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Mint Digital Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mint Digital Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Spotify (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Spotify cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Mint Digital Services

Spotify
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.