Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyMinnesota Pollution Control Agency
VS
SUEZSUEZ
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

520 Lafayette Road North , St. Paul, 55155, US

Last Update: 30/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.pca.state.mn.us/
755/1000Fair

The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency monitors environmental quality, offers technical and financial assistance and enforces environmental regulations. The MPCA finds and cleans up spills or leaks that can affect our health and environment. Staff develop statewide poli...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:823
Subsidiaries:59
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SUEZ

SUEZ

La Défense, Paris, 92040, FR

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.suez.com
797/1000Fair

We provide essential services in the water and waste sectors to preserve resources and improve quality of life wherever we operate. As a global player for over 160 years, we support public and private actors with resilient and innovative solutions. With a presence in ...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:26,444
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SUEZ

SUEZ

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minnesota Pollution Control Agency in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SUEZ in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SUEZ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SUEZ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SUEZ

SUEZ

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Minnesota Pollution Control Agency company and SUEZ company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Minnesota Pollution Control Agency company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Minnesota Pollution Control Agency company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Minnesota Pollution Control Agency company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Minnesota Pollution Control Agency company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Minnesota Pollution Control Agency company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Minnesota Pollution Control Agency company and SUEZ company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Minnesota Pollution Control Agency company and SUEZ company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Minnesota Pollution Control Agency company and SUEZ company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Minnesota Pollution Control Agency company and SUEZ company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Minnesota Pollution Control Agency company and SUEZ company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and SUEZ, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and SUEZ, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Minnesota Pollution Control Agency or SUEZ ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Minnesota Pollution Control Agency or SUEZ ?
Between Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and SUEZ, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and SUEZ, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3