Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Minnesota Energy ResourcesMinnesota Energy Resources
VS
Eskom Holdings SOC LtdEskom Holdings SOC Ltd
Minnesota Energy Resources

Minnesota Energy Resources

US

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Minnesota Energy Resources is a regulated natural gas utility serving over 238,000 customers in Minnesota. Our service area includes more than 38,000 sq. miles, 55 counties and 179 communities from Canada to the Iowa border, and from the Dakotas to Wisconsin. The compan...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:81
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd

Maxwell Drive, Sunninghill , Johannesburg, 2191, ZA

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eskom.co.za
798/1000Fair

Company profile Eskom Holdings generates, transports and distributes approximately 95% of South Africa’s electricity – making up 60% of the total electricity consumed on the African continent. Eskom is the world’s eleventh-largest power utility in terms of generating...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:42,212
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Minnesota Energy Resources

Minnesota Energy Resources

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minnesota Energy Resources in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Minnesota Energy Resources (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minnesota Energy Resources cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Minnesota Energy Resources

Minnesota Energy Resources

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ESK238221222

FAQ

Between Minnesota Energy Resources company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Minnesota Energy Resources company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Minnesota Energy Resources company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Minnesota Energy Resources company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Minnesota Energy Resources company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Minnesota Energy Resources company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Minnesota Energy Resources company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Minnesota Energy Resources company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Minnesota Energy Resources company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Minnesota Energy Resources company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Minnesota Energy Resources company and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Minnesota Energy Resources and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Minnesota Energy Resources and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Minnesota Energy Resources or Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Minnesota Energy Resources or Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd ?
Between Minnesota Energy Resources and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Minnesota Energy Resources and Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2