Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MINI CalgaryMINI Calgary
VS
Iveco GroupIveco Group
MINI Calgary

MINI Calgary

7699 110 Ave NW, Calgary, Alberta, T3R 1R8, CA

Last Update: 14/02/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://minicalgary.ca/
746/1000Moderate

MINI Calgary has been proudly serving the Calgary, Alberta community since 2005 as a premier MINI Dealership specialising in New & Used MINI Vehicle Sales, Service and Parts. Dedicated to helping you find the perfect vehicle for you; whether it is new, pre-owned model,...

NAICS:336
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:6
Subsidiaries:62
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Iveco Group

Iveco Group

Via Puglia 35, Torino, 10156, IT

Last Update: 21/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ivecogroup.com
762/1000Fair

Iveco Group N.V. (MI: IVG) is the home of unique people and brands that power your business and mission to advance a more sustainable society. The seven brands are each a major force in its specific business: IVECO, a pioneering commercial vehicles brand that designs, m...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:19,927
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MINI Calgary

MINI Calgary

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Iveco Group

Iveco Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MINI Calgary in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Iveco Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MINI Calgary (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MINI Calgary cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Iveco Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Iveco Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MINI Calgary

MINI Calgary

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Iveco Group

Iveco Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between MINI Calgary company and Iveco Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MINI Calgary company and Iveco Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MINI Calgary company and Iveco Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MINI Calgary company and Iveco Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MINI Calgary company and Iveco Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MINI Calgary company and Iveco Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MINI Calgary company and Iveco Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MINI Calgary company and Iveco Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MINI Calgary company and Iveco Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MINI Calgary company and Iveco Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MINI Calgary company and Iveco Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MINI Calgary and Iveco Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MINI Calgary and Iveco Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MINI Calgary or Iveco Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MINI Calgary or Iveco Group ?
Between MINI Calgary and Iveco Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MINI Calgary and Iveco Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA