Comparison Overview
Minera Centinela

Minera Centinela
Avenida Apoquindo 4001, Las Condes, Región Metropolitana de Santiago, 7550000, CL
Last Update: 21/02/2026
En julio de 2014 nace Minera Centinela, fruto de la integración de Minera El Tesoro y Minera Esperanza. La nueva compañía aprovecha a plenitud las evidentes sinergias existentes entre ambas empresas ubicadas en el mismo distrito minero, convirtiéndose así en una de l...

BHP
171 Collins Street, Melbourne, 3000, AU
Last Update: 03/08/2026
We are supplying the resources the world needs to help build a better, clearer future. Copper for renewable energy. Potash for sustainable farming. Iron ore and metallurgical coal for the steel needed for global infrastructure and the energy transition. #FutureIsClear ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Minera Centinela







BHP






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Minera Centinela in 2026.
Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)
BHP has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Minera Centinela (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Minera Centinela cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - BHP (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BHP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Minera Centinela

BHP
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.