Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Raglan MineRaglan Mine
VS
ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel IndiaArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India
Raglan Mine

Raglan Mine

1950 Rue Maurice Gauvin, Suite 300, Laval, Québec, H7S 1Z5, CA

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
756/1000Fair

We are Raglan Mine, a mining company established in Nunavik since 1997. We operate one of the purest nickel deposit series in the world. We are part of Glencore, one of the world's largest diversified natural resource companies. Our facilities include three active under...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:204
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India

ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India

27 km, Surat-Hazira Road , Surat, 394270, IN

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.amns.in
783/1000Fair

AM/NS India is a joint venture between the world's leading steel companies, ArcelorMittal and Nippon Steel. Established in December 2019, post-acquisition of Essar Steel, we are an integrated flat steel manufacturer - from iron ore to ready-to-market products. With over...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:11,401
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Raglan Mine

Raglan Mine

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India

ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Raglan Mine in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Raglan Mine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Raglan Mine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Raglan Mine

Raglan Mine

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India

ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Raglan Mine company and ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Raglan Mine company and ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Raglan Mine company and ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Raglan Mine company and ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Raglan Mine company and ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Raglan Mine company and ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Raglan Mine company and ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Raglan Mine company and ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Raglan Mine company and ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Raglan Mine company and ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Raglan Mine company and ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Raglan Mine and ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Raglan Mine and ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Raglan Mine or ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Raglan Mine or ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India ?
Between Raglan Mine and ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Raglan Mine and ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA