Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MikroTikMikroTik
VS
Springer NatureSpringer Nature
MikroTik

MikroTik

Brīvības gatve 214i, Rīga, LV-1039, LV

Last Update: 30/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.mikrotik.com
694/1000Weak

MikroTik is a Latvian company which was founded in 1996 to develop routers and wireless ISP systems. MikroTik now provides hardware and software for Internet connectivity in most of the countries around the world. Our experience in using industry standard PC hardware an...

NAICS:519
NAICS Definition:Other Information Services
Employees:678
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
6
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
Springer Nature

Springer Nature

Heidelberger Platz 3, Berlin, Berlin, DE, 14197

Last Update: 21/09/2026

View Profile
784/1000Fair

Be Part of Progress - together we bring greater understanding to the world Springer Nature is one of the leading publishers of research in the world. We publish the largest number of journals and books and are a pioneer in open research. Through our leading brands, tru...

NAICS:519
NAICS Definition:Other Information Services
Employees:13,737
Subsidiaries:31
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MikroTik

MikroTik

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Springer Nature

Springer Nature

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Services Industry Avg (This Year)

MikroTik has 215.79% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Information Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Springer Nature in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MikroTik (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MikroTik cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Springer Nature (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Springer Nature cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MikroTik

MikroTik

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MIK1790771017
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FORCHEMIKPALMICODIADOITR1789359970
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MIK1788690225
Springer Nature

Springer Nature

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between MikroTik company and Springer Nature company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MikroTik company and Springer Nature company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MikroTik company and Springer Nature company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MikroTik company and Springer Nature company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MikroTik company and Springer Nature company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MikroTik company and Springer Nature company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MikroTik company and Springer Nature company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MikroTik company and Springer Nature company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MikroTik company and Springer Nature company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MikroTik company and Springer Nature company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MikroTik company and Springer Nature company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MikroTik and Springer Nature, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MikroTik and Springer Nature, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MikroTik or Springer Nature ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MikroTik or Springer Nature ?
Between MikroTik and Springer Nature, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MikroTik and Springer Nature, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA