Comparison Overview
Miinto

Miinto
Prags Boulevard 49, Copenhagen, 2300, DK
Last Update: 10/07/2026
We strive to offer the most customer-centric fashion platform on the planet, where users can find the best selection of premium, luxury, and hand-picked local brands, specially curated to each individual user’s tastes and needs. Because in doing so, we can help empower ...

Prosus
Gustav Mahlerplein 5, Amsterdam, North Holland, NL, 1082MS
Last Update: 04/09/2026
Prosus is the power behind the world’s leading lifestyle e-commerce brands. Bringing together bold ideas and the power of AI, Prosus builds technology ecosystems where lifestyle ecommerce brands can become global success stories. These ecosystems span three core geogra...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Miinto







Prosus






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
Miinto has 38.65% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Prosus in 2026.
Incident History - Miinto (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Miinto cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Prosus (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Prosus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Miinto

Prosus
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.