Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Middlesbrough CouncilMiddlesbrough Council
VS
BelastingdienstBelastingdienst
Middlesbrough Council

Middlesbrough Council

Civic Centre, Middlesbrough, TS1 9FY, GB

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
749/1000Moderate

Middlesbrough is a fantastic place, proud of its heritage and ambitious enough to shape an entirely different future. At Middlesbrough Council we have set our city-scale plans to deliver over £600 million of investment that will promote economic growth and strengthen ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:1,448
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Belastingdienst

Belastingdienst

Korte Voorhout 7, Den Haag, NL, 2500 EE

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
788/1000Fair

De organisatie bestaat uit diverse onderdelen, waaronder de Belastingdienst, Douane, Toeslagen, FIOD en enkele facilitaire organisaties. Met ruim 30.000 medewerkers werken we in kantoren die verspreid zijn over het hele land. Gezamenlijk heffen, innen en controleren we ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:17,978
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Middlesbrough Council

Middlesbrough Council

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Belastingdienst

Belastingdienst

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Middlesbrough Council in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Belastingdienst in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Middlesbrough Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Middlesbrough Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Belastingdienst (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Belastingdienst cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Middlesbrough Council

Middlesbrough Council

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MID2292222100325
Belastingdienst

Belastingdienst

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Middlesbrough Council company and Belastingdienst company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Middlesbrough Council company and Belastingdienst company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Middlesbrough Council company and Belastingdienst company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Middlesbrough Council company and Belastingdienst company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Middlesbrough Council company and Belastingdienst company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Middlesbrough Council company and Belastingdienst company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Middlesbrough Council company and Belastingdienst company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Middlesbrough Council company and Belastingdienst company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Middlesbrough Council company and Belastingdienst company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Middlesbrough Council company and Belastingdienst company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Middlesbrough Council company and Belastingdienst company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Middlesbrough Council and Belastingdienst, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Middlesbrough Council and Belastingdienst, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Middlesbrough Council or Belastingdienst ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Middlesbrough Council or Belastingdienst ?
Between Middlesbrough Council and Belastingdienst, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Middlesbrough Council and Belastingdienst, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9