Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi KaseiMICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei
VS
LyondellBasellLyondellBasell
MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei

MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei

1-1-2 Yurakucho, Chiyoda, 1000006, JP

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile

Asahi Kasei is a pioneer of hollow fiber membranes, and we have successfully put them into practical use in many applications such as water treatment, ultrapure water, endotoxin free water, food and beverage process, biopharma, refininng particles.

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:3
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
LyondellBasell

LyondellBasell

LyondellBasell Tower, Ste. 700, 1221 McKinney Street, Houston, TX, US, 77010

Last Update: 21/09/2026

View Profile
794/1000Fair

We are LyondellBasell (NYSE: LYB) – a leader in the global chemical industry creating solutions for everyday sustainable living. Through advanced technology and focused investments, we are enabling a circular and low carbon economy. Across all we do, we aim to unlock va...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:15,083
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei

MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
LyondellBasell

LyondellBasell

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LyondellBasell in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - LyondellBasell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LyondellBasell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei

MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
LyondellBasell

LyondellBasell

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei company and LyondellBasell company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei company and LyondellBasell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei company and LyondellBasell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei company and LyondellBasell company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei company and LyondellBasell company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei company and LyondellBasell company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei company and LyondellBasell company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei company and LyondellBasell company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei company and LyondellBasell company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei company and LyondellBasell company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei company and LyondellBasell company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei and LyondellBasell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei and LyondellBasell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei or LyondellBasell ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei or LyondellBasell ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei and LyondellBasell, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei and LyondellBasell, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-103761
SUMMARY

Mooncake transfer engine through 0.3.13.post1 contains a memory exhaustion vulnerability in TransferMetadata::receivePeerNotify that allows unauthenticated attackers to grow process memory without limit. Attackers can repeatedly send notify frames up to 1 MB to the handshake RPC port, filling the uncapped notifys vector until the out-of-memory killer terminates the engine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-103760
SUMMARY

Mooncake transfer engine through 0.3.13.post1 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to block the handshake daemon by never reading replies. Attackers can send a Metadata request to the handshake RPC port and stall SocketHandShakePlugin's single listener thread in writeFully(), breaking all subsequent handshakes, metadata fetches, notify and probe requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-71427
SUMMARY

Office-PowerPoint-MCP-Server through 2.0.7 contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows MCP callers to write and read files outside the working directory by supplying absolute paths or ../ sequences. Attackers can steer an AI agent via prompt injection to abuse save_presentation, open_presentation, or manage_image output_path to overwrite any server-writable file or load external files.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86344
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in 389-ds-base. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a complete LDAP operation followed by the first bytes of an incomplete LDAPMessage on the same connection, causing the server to hand that connection to a second worker thread before the first worker's result is flushed. The second worker blocks until nsslapd-ioblocktimeout while holding the connection mutex, preventing delivery of the completed operation's result. Repeating this across a small number of connections proportional to the configured worker-thread pool size exhausts the entire pool under default configuration, denying service to all clients (anonymous and authenticated, plaintext and TLS) for as long as the attacker maintains the connections.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-71454
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in CWE-79 - Cross-site Scripting CAPEC-63 allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects CAPEC-63: before 3.0b63.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA