Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi KaseiMICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei
VS
AkzoNobelAkzoNobel
MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei

MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei

1-1-2 Yurakucho, Chiyoda, 1000006, JP

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile

Asahi Kasei is a pioneer of hollow fiber membranes, and we have successfully put them into practical use in many applications such as water treatment, ultrapure water, endotoxin free water, food and beverage process, biopharma, refininng particles.

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:3
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AkzoNobel

AkzoNobel

Christian Neefestraat 2, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, NL, 1077 WW

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.akzonobel.com
318/1000Critical

Since 1792, we’ve been supplying the innovative paints and coatings that help to color people’s lives and protect what matters most. Our world class portfolio of brands – including Dulux, International, Sikkens and Interpon – is trusted by customers around the globe. We...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:31,151
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei

MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AkzoNobel

AkzoNobel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

AkzoNobel has 86.92% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AkzoNobel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AkzoNobel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei

MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AkzoNobel

AkzoNobel

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AKZINSHYDPOWWES1775047452
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AKZ1772649747
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AKZ1772583818

FAQ

Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei company and AkzoNobel company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei company and AkzoNobel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei company and AkzoNobel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei company and AkzoNobel company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei company and AkzoNobel company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei company and AkzoNobel company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei company and AkzoNobel company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei company and AkzoNobel company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei company and AkzoNobel company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei company and AkzoNobel company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei company and AkzoNobel company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei and AkzoNobel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei and AkzoNobel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei or AkzoNobel ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei or AkzoNobel ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei and AkzoNobel, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MICROZA Membrane Filtration - Asahi Kasei and AkzoNobel, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-48777
SUMMARY

FileBrowser Quantum is a free, self-hosted, web-based file manager. Versions prior to 1.3.2-stable, 1.4.0-beta and 1.4.1-beta are vulnerable to Path Traversal through the publicPatchHandler in backend/http/public.go which joins user-controlled fromPath and toPath body fields with the trusted d.share.Path BEFORE the downstream sanitizer runs. Because filepath.Join collapses .. segments during the join, the sanitizer in resourcePatchHandler never sees the traversal and the move/copy/rename operates on a path outside the shared directory. The same root-cause pattern was patched for the bulk DELETE endpoint as CVE-2026-44542 (GHSA-fwj3-42wh-8673), but the PATCH handler with the identical pattern was not updated. A public share link with AllowModify=true is sufficient to exploit this. Anyone holding such a link can move, copy, or rename arbitrary files within the share owner's source root. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.3.3-stable and 1.4.2-beta.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47750
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the GLOBAL opcode handler. The issue was caused by missing validation when searching for newline-delimited fields. A crafted .ckpt file without the expected newline could cause the parser to use -1 as a copy length, resulting in immediate heap corruption. The attack requires the victim or application to load a .ckpt file from an untrusted source, such as a downloaded model from a model sharing site. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by following these instructions: do not load .ckpt checkpoint files from untrusted sources, and prefer trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-47747
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the BINUNICODE opcode handler. The issue was caused by sign confusion on the opcode length field. A crafted .ckpt file could trigger memcpy with a very large length derived from a negative signed value, causing immediate heap corruption. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by only loading .ckpt checkpoint files from trusted sources and preferring trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-46448
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Nova before 33.0.2, the server create API does not strip certain hint data. The resulting instance has no Placement allocation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-22313
SUMMARY

The device has a webserver that exposes a REST API authenticated with a token on the management network. By exploiting an OS command injection vulnerability an authenticated attacker can send arbitrary commands to the device that are executed with administrative permissions by the underlying operating system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3