Comparison Overview
MicroWorld Technologies Inc

MicroWorld Technologies Inc
Andheri (E), Mumbai, 400 093, IN
Last Update: 09/03/2026
MicroWorld Technologies is an advanced security solution provider specializing in AntiVirus, AntiSpam, Content Security and Network Intrusion Prevention solutions. Incorporated in New Jersey, USA, MicroWorld has offices in India, Germany, Malaysia, South Africa and M...

HubSpot
2 Canal Park, Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, 02141
Last Update: 03/04/2026
HubSpot is a leading CRM platform that provides software and support to help businesses grow better. Our platform includes marketing, sales, service, and website management products that start free and scale to meet our customers’ needs at any stage of growth. Today, th...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

MicroWorld Technologies Inc







HubSpot






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
MicroWorld Technologies Inc has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for HubSpot in 2026.
Incident History - MicroWorld Technologies Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MicroWorld Technologies Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - HubSpot (X = Date, Y = Severity)
HubSpot cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

MicroWorld Technologies Inc

HubSpot
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.
The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.
Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).
The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.
The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.