Comparison Overview
Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies
Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies
6 Brewery Close, Barker Business Park, Ripon, HG4 5NL, GB
Last Update: 16/06/2026
Microsoft Teams is the hub for teamwork in Microsoft 365. Invite everyone you work with to chat, meet, call, and collaborate all in one place, no matter where you are. With Teams you can: share your meeting agenda when sending out Microsoft Teams meeting invites, easily...
IBM
International Business Machines Corp., Armonk, New York, 10504, US
Last Update: 09/10/2026
At IBM, we do more than work. We create. We create as technologists, developers, and engineers. We create with our partners. We create with our competitors. If you're searching for ways to make the world work better through technology and infrastructure, software and co...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies
IBM
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
IBM has 1174.51% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - IBM (X = Date, Y = Severity)
IBM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies
IBM
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.