Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango TechnologiesMicrosoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies
VS
Allianz TechnologyAllianz Technology
Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies

Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies

6 Brewery Close, Barker Business Park, Ripon, HG4 5NL, GB

Last Update: 16/06/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://freshmango.co.uk/
753/1000Fair

Microsoft Teams is the hub for teamwork in Microsoft 365. Invite everyone you work with to chat, meet, call, and collaborate all in one place, no matter where you are. With Teams you can: share your meeting agenda when sending out Microsoft Teams meeting invites, easily...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Allianz Technology

Allianz Technology

Dieselstraße 8, Unterföhring, Bavaria, DE, 85774

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile

With its headquarters in Munich, Germany, Allianz Technology is Allianz's global IT service provider and delivers IT solutions that drive the group's digitalization. With more than 11,000 employees in more than 20 countries around the world, Allianz Technology is tasked...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:11,516
Subsidiaries:130
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies

Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Allianz Technology

Allianz Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allianz Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Allianz Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allianz Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies

Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MIC1778646224
Allianz Technology

Allianz Technology

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies company and Allianz Technology company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies company and Allianz Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies company and Allianz Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies company and Allianz Technology company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies company and Allianz Technology company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies company and Allianz Technology company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies company and Allianz Technology company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies company and Allianz Technology company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies company and Allianz Technology company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies company and Allianz Technology company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies company and Allianz Technology company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies and Allianz Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies and Allianz Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies or Allianz Technology ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies or Allianz Technology ?
Between Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies and Allianz Technology, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Microsoft Teams from Fresh Mango Technologies and Allianz Technology, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2