Comparison Overview
Microsoft for Healthcare

Microsoft for Healthcare
1 Microsoft Way, Redmond, 98052, US
Last Update: 13/03/2026
At Microsoft and with our health industry partners, we strive to achieve the goal of better health globally; offering people-first solutions to empower organizations, patients, and care providers. Using Microsoft platforms and technologies, Microsoft for Healthcare pro...

Workday
6110 Stoneridge Mall Rd, Pleasanton, 94588, US
Last Update: 12/09/2026
By unifying HR and Finance on an open, trusted platform powered by AI, Workday delivers high-impact outcomes our customers can count on. At the heart of our platform is Sana from Workday—the superintelligence that puts AI agents to work for you and your people. Welcome ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Microsoft for Healthcare







Workday






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Microsoft for Healthcare in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Workday has 1.96% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Microsoft for Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Microsoft for Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Workday (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Workday cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Microsoft for Healthcare

Workday
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Nginx Proxy Manager through 2.16.0 fails to restrict the advanced_config field to administrators, allowing non-admin users with manage permissions to inject arbitrary nginx directives. Attackers can inject malicious nginx configuration such as alias directives to serve arbitrary files or control routing for their assigned hosts.
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/README.md#L36
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/backend/internal/user.js#L52-L62
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/backend/templates/proxy_host.conf#L28
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/issues/5749
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/pull/5908
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nginx-proxy-manager-through-2.16.0-improper-authorization-via-advanced-config
Nginx Proxy Manager through 2.16.0 lacks rate-limiting on authentication endpoints, allowing unauthenticated attackers to make unlimited password guesses against any account. Attackers can brute-force login credentials via POST /api/tokens and subsequently guess TOTP codes via POST /api/tokens/2fa to gain full session access and administrative control.
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/backend/app.js#L15-L58
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/backend/internal/2fa.js#L196-L240
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/backend/internal/token.js#L154-L182
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/pull/5908
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nginx-proxy-manager-through-2.16.0-missing-brute-force-protection
httpdbg before 2.2.1 fails to validate URL schemes in recorded HTTP request URLs rendered as clickable links in the web interface. Attackers controlling traffic recorded by httpdbg can supply javascript: scheme URLs that execute malicious scripts in the application origin when clicked, allowing access to captured request and response data including headers and tokens.
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/blob/v2.2.0/httpdbg/hooks/recordhttp2.py#L88-L97
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/blob/v2.2.0/httpdbg/webapp/static/index.htm#L302
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/commit/121845b41c19ddaf30b51be0797bc2ff4847d8b3
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/issues/220
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/pull/222
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/releases/tag/v2.2.1
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/httpdbg-before-2.2.1-stored-cross-site-scripting-via-javascript-url
Dozzle versions before 11.1.2 fail to sanitize container display names when building ZIP archive entry names in the log download endpoint. Attackers who can label containers can use path traversal sequences to write files outside the extraction directory when users download and extract logs.
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/blob/v11.1.1/internal/container/docker/client.go#L610-L614
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/blob/v11.1.1/internal/web/download.go#L141-L146
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/commit/bc07db73dd84ce2cb939b744e983a8cfdf29c644
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/pull/5242
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/releases/tag/v11.1.2
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/dozzle-before-11.1.2-path-traversal-via-log-zip-download
A vulnerability has been found in Ziroom ZHOME A0101 1.0.1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /api/ZRQos/set_online_client. The manipulation of the argument ip leads to command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.