Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Microsoft Dynamics 365Microsoft Dynamics 365
VS
CiscoCisco
Microsoft Dynamics 365

Microsoft Dynamics 365

16061 NE 36th Way, Redmond, 98052, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.dynamics.com
560/1000Very Poor

Keep up on the latest news and events for Microsoft Dynamics 365, the only portfolio of intelligent business applications that gives you the agility to deliver operational excellence and delight every customer.

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:3
Subsidiaries:52
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
Cisco

Cisco

Tasman Way, San Jose, 95134, US

Last Update: 01/10/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.cisco.com
100/1000Critical

Cisco is the worldwide technology leader that is revolutionizing the way organizations connect and protect in the AI era. For more than 40 years, Cisco has securely connected the world. With its industry leading AI-powered solutions and services, Cisco enables its custo...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:95,930
Subsidiaries:29
12-month incidents
37
Known data breaches
11
Attack type number
5

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Microsoft Dynamics 365

Microsoft Dynamics 365

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Cisco

Cisco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Microsoft Dynamics 365 has 88.68% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Cisco has 3527.45% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Microsoft Dynamics 365 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Microsoft Dynamics 365 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Cisco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cisco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Microsoft Dynamics 365

Microsoft Dynamics 365

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ALL1785522998
🔒 Incident : Breach
GEINUAMIC1770196655
Cisco

Cisco

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CIS1790843052
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CIS1789446229
🔒 Incident : Breach
GOOCHECISADA1789683908

FAQ

Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 company and Cisco company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 company and Cisco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 company and Cisco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 company and Cisco company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 company and Cisco company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 company and Cisco company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 company and Cisco company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Cisco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Cisco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Microsoft Dynamics 365 or Cisco ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Microsoft Dynamics 365 or Cisco ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Cisco, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Cisco, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96451
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Ultimate Member Ultimate Member ultimate-member allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Ultimate Member: from n/a through 2.13.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103342
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Unlimited Elements Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) unlimited-elements-for-elementor allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates): from n/a through 2.0.20.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103065
SUMMARY

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Themeum Kirki kirki allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Kirki: from n/a through 6.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105122
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers able to register or modify OAuth 2.0 clients to make OpenAM fetch internal resources via an unvalidated jwks_uri. Attackers can trigger unauthenticated fetches through client-authentication and ID-token validation to probe internal hosts, metadata endpoints or local files, or exhaust request threads for denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105121
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows delegated administrators to destroy sessions outside their realms because realm checks use the requester's realm. Authenticated accounts holding the iplanet-am-session-destroy-sessions attribute can supply a target session identifier or handle to forcibly log out users in any realm.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
REFERENCES