Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Microsoft DeveloperMicrosoft Developer
VS
CiscoCisco
Microsoft Developer

Microsoft Developer

N/A

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/
749/1000Moderate

The Microsoft Developers community is a resource hub built for passionate developers. Follow along for tips, tricks, research and more to help you fuel innovation and build apps that users love.

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:1
Subsidiaries:50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Cisco

Cisco

Tasman Way, San Jose, 95134, US

Last Update: 13/10/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.cisco.com
100/1000Critical

Cisco is the worldwide technology leader that is revolutionizing the way organizations connect and protect in the AI era. For more than 40 years, Cisco has securely connected the world. With its industry leading AI-powered solutions and services, Cisco enables its custo...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:95,930
Subsidiaries:29
12-month incidents
38
Known data breaches
11
Attack type number
5

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Microsoft Developer

Microsoft Developer

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Cisco

Cisco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Microsoft Developer in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Cisco has 3625.49% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Microsoft Developer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Microsoft Developer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Cisco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cisco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Microsoft Developer

Microsoft Developer

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Cisco

Cisco

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
SPL1791448034
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CIS1790843052
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CIS1789446229

FAQ

Between Microsoft Developer company and Cisco company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Microsoft Developer company and Cisco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Microsoft Developer company and Cisco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Microsoft Developer company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Microsoft Developer company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Microsoft Developer company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Microsoft Developer company and Cisco company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Microsoft Developer company and Cisco company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Microsoft Developer company and Cisco company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Microsoft Developer company and Cisco company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Microsoft Developer company and Cisco company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Microsoft Developer and Cisco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Microsoft Developer and Cisco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Microsoft Developer or Cisco ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Microsoft Developer or Cisco ?
Between Microsoft Developer and Cisco, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Microsoft Developer and Cisco, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
REFERENCES