Comparison Overview

Microsoft Cloud

VS

Infor

Microsoft Cloud

16061 NE 36th Way, Redmond, 98052, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18

Efficient solutions that fit your business. ☁️ Follow along for the latest news and updates from the trusted #MSCloud team.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
10
Attack type number
5

Infor

641 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY, US, 10011
Last Update: 2026-01-25
Between 750 and 799

Infor is a global leader in business cloud software products for companies in industry specific markets. Infor builds complete industry suites in the cloud and efficiently deploys technology that puts the user experience first, leverages data science, and integrates easily into existing systems. Over 60,000 organizations worldwide rely on Infor to help overcome market disruptions and achieve business-wide digital transformation. Here are some key insights: • 60,000+ customers • 100+ offices • 1,700+ support experts • 2,000+ partners • 17,000+ employees • 175+ countries where customers are located • 15,000+ cloud customers • 40+ countries with Infor offices

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 22,180
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/microsoft-cloud-platform.jpeg
Microsoft Cloud
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infor.jpeg
Infor
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Microsoft Cloud
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Infor
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Microsoft Cloud in 2026.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Infor in 2026.

Incident History — Microsoft Cloud (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Microsoft Cloud cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Infor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Infor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/microsoft-cloud-platform.jpeg
Microsoft Cloud
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Infostealing Malware
Motivation: Financial Gain, Account Takeovers, Ransomware Attacks
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Infostealing Malware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Improper token validation in Azure SSO
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infor.jpeg
Infor
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Infor company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Microsoft Cloud company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Microsoft Cloud company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Infor company has not reported any.

In the current year, Microsoft Cloud company has reported more cyber incidents than Infor company.

Microsoft Cloud company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Infor company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Microsoft Cloud company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Infor company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Microsoft Cloud company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Infor company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Microsoft Cloud company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Infor company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Microsoft Cloud nor Infor holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Microsoft Cloud company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Infor company.

Infor company employs more people globally than Microsoft Cloud company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Microsoft Cloud nor Infor holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Microsoft Cloud nor Infor holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Microsoft Cloud nor Infor holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Microsoft Cloud nor Infor holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Microsoft Cloud nor Infor holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Microsoft Cloud nor Infor holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.