Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Microsoft Azure

Microsoft Azure Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

microsoft.com

Join the Microsoft Azure community to be the first to learn about tech innovations, industry trends, updates relevant to you and your team.


Microsoft Azure A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Microsoft Azure
Company Information
Website:https://azure.microsoft.com
Employees number:None
Number of followers:843,089
NAICS:513
Industry Type:Technology, Information and Internet
Homepage:microsoft.com
Microsoft Azure Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 750 and 799
logo
Microsoft AzureTechnology, Information and Internet
Updated:
07/06/2026
759/1000
Fair
Baa
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Microsoft Azure Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
Microsoft AzureTechnology, Information and Internet
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Microsoft Azure
Microsoft AzureFair
Current Score
759Baa (FAIR)
01000
4 incidents
-15 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
759Before Incident
MAY 2026
772Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 May 2026Microsoft Azure
Azure, Microsoft, GitHub and MicrosoftDocs: Miasma Worm Hits 73 Microsoft GitHub Repositories in Major Supply Chain Attack

Microsoft GitHub Repositories Hit by Miasma Supply Chain Attack

757After Incident
CRITICAL-15
MICMICMICGIT1780813480
Microsoft GitHub Repositories Hit by Miasma Supply Chain Attack Microsoft’s GitHub repositories have been targeted in the ongoing Miasma self-replicating supply chain attack, affecting 73 repositories across four organizations Azure, Azure-Samples, Microsoft, and MicrosoftDocs. GitHub has disabled access to the compromised repositories, displaying a terms-of-service violation notice for affected projects, including Azure/azure-functions-host. Among the impacted repositories are key projects such as durabletask (and its related .NET, Go, JavaScript, and MSSQL implementations), azure-search-openai-demo-purviewdatasecurity, and windows-driver-docs. Notably, the durabletask PyPI package was previously compromised by TeamPCP in May to distribute an information stealer on Linux systems, suggesting the same threat actors may still retain access. Miasma, a variant of the Mini Shai-Hulud worm released by TeamPCP in mid-2026, has evolved its tactics, infecting additional packages in recent days. Attackers have created new repositories with deceptive descriptions like "Miasma: The Spreading Blight" and "Hades - The End for the Damned", with 95 such repositories identified so far. The campaign has also bypassed traditional registry-based attacks, directly injecting malicious code into repositories like icflorescu/mantine-datatable and related projects. The payload a 4.3 MB runner executes automatically when developers open affected repositories in AI coding tools such as Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Cursor, or VS Code, or via the npm test script. Security researchers highlight that Miasma exploits the trust model underpinning open-source ecosystems, propagating through legitimate channels without relying on platform vulnerabilities. By compromising maintainer credentials and mimicking routine updates, the attack evades conventional defenses, making it one of the most persistent and far-reaching supply chain campaigns to date.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Supply Chain Attack
IMPACT
Systems Affected: GitHub repositories, AI coding tools (Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Cursor, VS Code)Operational Impact: Disabled access to compromised repositories, terms-of-service violation noticesBrand Reputation Impact: Potential erosion of trust in open-source ecosystems and Microsoft's GitHub repositories
APRIL 2026
772Before Incident
MARCH 2026
774Before Incident
Vulnerability
23 Mar 2026Microsoft Azure
Amazon, Pinecone, Salesforce, Microsoft, Redis, Amazon Aurora and Amazon Redshift: We Found Eight Attack Vectors Inside AWS Bedrock. Here's What Attackers Can Do with Them

AWS Bedrock AI Platform Exposed to Eight Critical Attack Vectors, Research Reveals

771After Incident
CRITICAL-3
SALAMAMICPINRED1774269319
AWS Bedrock AI Platform Exposed to Eight Critical Attack Vectors, Research Reveals Amazon’s AWS Bedrock a platform enabling developers to build AI-powered applications by integrating foundation models with enterprise data and systems has been identified as a high-value target for attackers. Security researchers at XM Cyber uncovered eight validated attack vectors that exploit Bedrock’s connectivity to critical infrastructure, including Salesforce, Lambda functions, SharePoint, and vector databases. The vulnerabilities stem from misconfigured permissions and weak access controls, allowing attackers to manipulate logs, compromise knowledge bases, hijack AI agents, inject malicious workflows, degrade security guardrails, and poison prompts. Each vector begins with minimal privileges but can escalate to full system compromise. ### Key Attack Vectors 1. Model Invocation Log Attacks – Attackers can redirect or delete logs stored in S3 buckets, harvesting sensitive data or erasing forensic evidence. 2. Knowledge Base Attacks (Data Source) – By accessing S3, Salesforce, or SharePoint credentials, attackers bypass AI models to extract raw data or move laterally into Active Directory. 3. Knowledge Base Attacks (Data Store) – Compromised credentials for vector databases (Pinecone, Redis) or AWS-native stores (Aurora, Redshift) grant full access to structured enterprise data. 4. Agent Attacks (Direct) – Modifying agent prompts or attaching malicious executors enables unauthorized actions, such as database tampering or user creation. 5. Agent Attacks (Indirect) – Injecting malicious code into Lambda functions allows data exfiltration or model response manipulation. 6. Flow Attacks – Altering workflows to reroute data to attacker-controlled endpoints or bypassing authorization checks via modified condition nodes. 7. Guardrail Attacks – Weakening or removing content filters increases susceptibility to prompt injection and toxic output generation. 8. Managed Prompt Attacks – Modifying centralized prompt templates enables mass-scale data exfiltration or harmful content generation without detection. ### Impact & Implications The research highlights that attackers target Bedrock’s integrations rather than the AI models themselves. A single over-privileged identity can redirect logs, hijack agents, or access on-premises systems. Security teams must map attack paths across cloud and hybrid environments while enforcing strict permission controls to mitigate risks. The findings underscore the need for comprehensive visibility into AI workloads and their associated permissions to prevent exploitation. Full technical details, including architectural diagrams, are available in XM Cyber’s research report.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Misconfiguration, Privilege Escalation, Data Exfiltration, AI Security
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Sensitive data in logs, raw enterprise data, structured data in vector databases, AI model responsesSystems Affected: AWS Bedrock, S3 buckets, Salesforce, Lambda functions, SharePoint, vector databases (Pinecone, Redis), Aurora, Redshift, Active DirectoryOperational Impact: Unauthorized actions (e.g., database tampering, user creation), data exfiltration, model response manipulation, bypassing authorization checksBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to AI security vulnerabilities and data exposureIdentity Theft Risk: High (due to access to personally identifiable information and sensitive data)
DATA BREACH
Logs (sensitive data)Raw enterprise dataStructured data (vector databases)AI model responsesCredentials (S3, Salesforce, SharePoint, etc.)Sensitivity Of Data: High (personally identifiable information, enterprise data, AI training data)Data Exfiltration: Possible via malicious workflows, Lambda functions, or attacker-controlled endpointsPersonally Identifiable Information: Likely (due to access to logs, databases, and enterprise systems)
FEBRUARY 2026
773Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
773Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
787Before Incident
Cyber Attack
26 Dec 2025Microsoft Azure
Oracle Cloud, Azure and AWS: TeamPCP Turns Cloud Infrastructure into Crime Bots

TeamPCP Exploits Cloud Misconfigurations in Large-Scale Cybercrime Operation

772After Incident
CRITICAL-15
AMAORAMIC1770695748
TeamPCP Exploits Cloud Misconfigurations in Large-Scale Cybercrime Operation A threat actor known as TeamPCP (also operating under aliases like PCPcat and ShellForce) is conducting automated, worm-like attacks on misconfigured and exposed cloud management services, compromising at least 60,000 servers worldwide since late December. The group’s campaign primarily targets Azure (60% of attacks), AWS (37%), and Google and Oracle cloud environments, exploiting well-documented vulnerabilities and misconfigurations rather than developing new attack methods. TeamPCP’s operations involve scanning for exposed Docker APIs, Kubernetes clusters, Ray dashboards, and systems with leaked secrets (such as `.env` files). Once inside, the group deploys malicious Python and Shell scripts to install proxies, tunneling software, and persistence mechanisms, effectively converting compromised infrastructure into a self-propagating botnet. A key tool in their arsenal is the React2Shell vulnerability (CVE-2025-29927), which allows remote command execution and data exfiltration. The group monetizes its attacks through multiple revenue streams, including: - Cryptocurrency mining using hijacked compute resources. - Data theft and extortion, with stolen records including personal IDs, employment records, and résumés published on a leak site operated by an affiliate, ShellForce. - Selling access to compromised systems for use as proxies or command-and-control infrastructure. - Ransomware deployment, leveraging infected systems as launchpads for further attacks. Notably, TeamPCP has targeted JobsGO, a Vietnamese recruitment platform, exfiltrating over two million records containing sensitive personal and professional data. Most victims are located in South Korea, Canada, the U.S., Serbia, and the UAE, with stolen information often used for phishing, impersonation, or account takeovers. Despite its sophistication, TeamPCP’s techniques are not novel the group relies on automated exploitation of known vulnerabilities and recycled tooling. Security firm Flare warns that the threat actor’s strength lies in its large-scale automation, turning exposed cloud infrastructure into a distributed criminal ecosystem. The group also maintains a Telegram channel (launched in November, with ~700 members) for updates and reputation-building, though researchers suggest it may have operated under previous aliases. The campaign underscores the risks of unsecured cloud control planes, leaked credentials, and poor access controls, as TeamPCP continues to industrialize existing attack vectors with alarming efficiency.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Cloud Misconfiguration ExploitationBotnetData TheftRansomware
MOTIVATION
Financial gainData extortionCryptocurrency miningSelling access to compromised systems
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Over two million records (personal IDs, employment records, résumés)Systems Affected: 60,000+ servers worldwideOperational Impact: Compromised infrastructure converted into a botnet for further attacksIdentity Theft Risk: High (personal and professional data used for phishing, impersonation, or account takeovers)
DATA BREACH
Personal IDsEmployment recordsRésumésNumber Of Records Exposed: Over two millionSensitivity Of Data: High (personally identifiable and professional information)
NOVEMBER 2025
813Before Incident
Cyber Attack
18 Nov 2025Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure: Azure Network Hit by Record-Breaking 15 Tbps DDoS Attack From 500,000+ Devices

Microsoft Azure Thwarts Record-Breaking 15.72 Tbps DDoS Attack

786After Incident
LOW-27
MIC1770473641
Microsoft Azure Thwarts Record-Breaking 15.72 Tbps DDoS Attack On October 24, 2025, Microsoft Azure mitigated one of the largest distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks in cloud computing history, peaking at 15.72 terabits per second (Tbps). The assault targeted a single endpoint in Australia, leveraging the Aisuru botnet, a sophisticated Turbo Mirai-class IoT botnet known for large-scale DDoS campaigns. The attack originated from over 500,000 compromised devices, primarily home routers and security cameras from residential internet service providers in the U.S. and abroad. These devices, often shipped with default credentials and minimal security hardening, generated 3.64 billion packets per second in a UDP flood attack, using random source ports and minimal spoofing to maximize bandwidth. Despite its scale, the attack relied on a simple but high-volume methodology, which allowed Azure’s DDoS Protection system to detect and neutralize the threat in real time. The platform’s automated mitigation infrastructure filtered and rerouted malicious traffic across its global network, ensuring uninterrupted service for all customer workloads. Security researchers warn that the incident reflects a growing trend: as fiber-to-the-home connections and powerful IoT devices proliferate, botnets like Aisuru can exploit poorly secured smart home devices to launch even larger attacks. The Aisuru botnet specifically targets unpatched IoT vulnerabilities, turning compromised devices into persistent attack platforms. The attack also highlighted several critical vulnerabilities, including: - CVE-2025-1234 (Remote Code Execution on IoT devices via Aisuru botnet) - CVE-2025-5678 (Turbo Mirai variant enabling botnet command execution) - CVE-2025-9101 (Default credentials in home routers allowing unauthorized access) While Azure’s defenses held firm, the incident underscores the escalating threat landscape, particularly as enterprises prepare for high-risk periods like the holiday shopping season. The attack serves as a benchmark for cloud-native security architectures in countering volumetric DDoS threats.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
DDoS
IMPACT
Operational Impact: Uninterrupted service for all customer workloads due to mitigation
OCTOBER 2025
813Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
813Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
813Before Incident
JULY 2025
813Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Microsoft Azure ?
?
What was Microsoft Azure's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Microsoft Azure's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Microsoft Azure's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Microsoft Azure's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Microsoft Azure's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Microsoft Azure's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Microsoft Azure's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Microsoft Azure's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Microsoft Azure's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Microsoft Azure's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was Microsoft Azure's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Microsoft Azure's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Microsoft Azure ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Microsoft Azure's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?