Comparison Overview

Microsoft AI

VS

ServiceNow

Microsoft AI

Redmond, Washington, US, 98052
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 650 and 699

At MAI, we are pioneering the future of what AI and consumer technology can be.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 2,113
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

ServiceNow

2225 Lawson Lane, Santa Clara, CA, US, 95054
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 800 and 849

ServiceNow (NYSE: NOW) makes the world work better for everyone. Our cloud-based platform and solutions help digitize and unify organizations so that they can find smarter, faster, better ways to make work flow. So employees and customers can be more connected, more innovative, and more agile. And we can all create the future we imagine. The world works with ServiceNow. For more information, visit www.servicenow.com.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 31,971
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/microsoft-ai.jpeg
Microsoft AI
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/servicenow.jpeg
ServiceNow
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Microsoft AI
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ServiceNow
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Microsoft AI in 2026.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

ServiceNow has 30.56% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Microsoft AI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Microsoft AI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ServiceNow (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ServiceNow cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/microsoft-ai.jpeg
Microsoft AI
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Accidental Data Exposure
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/servicenow.jpeg
ServiceNow
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Impersonation without authentication
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Misconfigured or overly permissive ACLs
Motivation: Data Exfiltration
Blog: Blog

FAQ

ServiceNow company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Microsoft AI company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Microsoft AI and ServiceNow have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, ServiceNow company has reported more cyber incidents than Microsoft AI company.

Neither ServiceNow company nor Microsoft AI company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Microsoft AI company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other ServiceNow company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ServiceNow company nor Microsoft AI company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

ServiceNow company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Microsoft AI company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Microsoft AI nor ServiceNow holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ServiceNow company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Microsoft AI company.

ServiceNow company employs more people globally than Microsoft AI company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Microsoft AI nor ServiceNow holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Microsoft AI nor ServiceNow holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Microsoft AI nor ServiceNow holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Microsoft AI nor ServiceNow holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Microsoft AI nor ServiceNow holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Microsoft AI nor ServiceNow holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.