Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Microsoft 365Microsoft 365
VS
Zensar TechnologiesZensar Technologies
Microsoft 365

Microsoft 365

1 Microsoft Way, Redmond, 98052, US

Last Update: 04/06/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Microsoft 365 is the world's productivity cloud designed to help you achieve more across work and life.

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:41
Subsidiaries:52
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Zensar Technologies

Zensar Technologies

Zensar Knowledge Park, Kharadi, Plot # 4, MIDC, Pune, Maharashtra, IN, 411014

Last Update: 17/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.zensar.com/
754/1000Fair

Zensar stands out as a premier technology consulting and services company, embracing an ‘experience-led everything’ philosophy. We are creators, thinkers, and problem solvers passionate about designing digital experiences that are engineered into scale-ready products, s...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:14,963
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Microsoft 365

Microsoft 365

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Zensar Technologies

Zensar Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Microsoft 365 has 31.51% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zensar Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Microsoft 365 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Microsoft 365 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Zensar Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zensar Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Microsoft 365

Microsoft 365

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
LINMIC1780539842
Zensar Technologies

Zensar Technologies

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Microsoft 365 company and Zensar Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Microsoft 365 company and Zensar Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Microsoft 365 company and Zensar Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Microsoft 365 company and Zensar Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Microsoft 365 company and Zensar Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Microsoft 365 company and Zensar Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Microsoft 365 company and Zensar Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Microsoft 365 company and Zensar Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Microsoft 365 company and Zensar Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Microsoft 365 company and Zensar Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Microsoft 365 company and Zensar Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Microsoft 365 and Zensar Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Microsoft 365 and Zensar Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Microsoft 365 or Zensar Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Microsoft 365 or Zensar Technologies ?
Between Microsoft 365 and Zensar Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Microsoft 365 and Zensar Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-84411
SUMMARY

The web management service in affected RouterOS versions contains an integer underflow in its HTTP request body handling that is reachable before authentication. This can be leveraged by an unauthenticated network attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root, or to cause a denial of service, using a single crafted request.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105051
SUMMARY

Denuvo Anti-Tamper through 2026-03-04 allows bypass of a hypervisor presence check via CPUID interception (SimpleSvm.sys on AMD; hyperkd.sys and hyperhv.dll on Intel).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 1.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
0.5
CVE-2026-105050
SUMMARY

PeaZip before 11.3.0, in a non-default configuration, is vulnerable to OS command injection via a filename in an archive because "quotation character already used in the string" is mishandled.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-105049
SUMMARY

Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 has a Playground feature that does not require authentication for proxying arbitrary HTTP and HTTPS requests to URLs on the public internet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105048
SUMMARY

The Playground feature of Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 allows SSRF (proxying of requests to private IP addresses).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2