Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UKMicrosoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK
VS
Infosys BPMInfosys BPM
Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK

Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK

6 Brewery Close, Barker Business Park, Ripon, HG4 5NL, GB

Last Update: 24/01/2026

View Profile

Microsoft 365 incorporates cloud-based email. With the advent of cloud-based email systems such as Microsoft 365 (formerly Office 365), not only has the link between server and email been severed but now you can email from anywhere you have an internet connection avai...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Infosys BPM

Infosys BPM

Infosys BPM Limited, Plot no 26/3, 26/4, 26/6, Hosur Road, Electronics City, Bengaluru, 560100, IN

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.infosysbpm.com
814/1000Good

Infosys BPM Ltd., the business process management subsidiary of Infosys Ltd. (NYSE: INFY), was set up in April 2002. Infosys BPM focuses on integrated end-to-end outsourcing and delivers transformational benefits to its clients through reduced costs, ongoing productivit...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:43,598
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK

Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Infosys BPM

Infosys BPM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Infosys BPM in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Infosys BPM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Infosys BPM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK

Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Infosys BPM

Infosys BPM

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK company and Infosys BPM company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK company and Infosys BPM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK company and Infosys BPM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK company and Infosys BPM company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK company and Infosys BPM company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK company and Infosys BPM company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK company and Infosys BPM company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK company and Infosys BPM company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK company and Infosys BPM company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK company and Infosys BPM company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK company and Infosys BPM company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK and Infosys BPM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK and Infosys BPM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK or Infosys BPM ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK or Infosys BPM ?
Between Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK and Infosys BPM, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Microsoft 365 Supply and Migration from Fresh Mango UK and Infosys BPM, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2