Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MICROS Systems IncMICROS Systems Inc
VS
AutodeskAutodesk
MICROS Systems Inc

MICROS Systems Inc

7031 Gateway Drive, Columbia, 21046, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile

Thank you for visiting MICROS Systems, Inc. In 2014, MICROS was acquired by Oracle, and as of February 13, 2015, this page will remain inactive. Please visit Oracle's LinkedIn page for updates on Oracle Hospitality: https://www.linkedin.com/company/oracle.

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:1,865
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Autodesk

Autodesk

Market St, San Francisco, CA, US, 94105

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.autodesk.com
810/1000Good

Autodesk is changing how the world is designed and made. Our technology spans architecture, engineering, construction, product design, manufacturing, and media and entertainment. We empower innovators everywhere to solve challenges, big and small. From greener buildi...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:15,698
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MICROS Systems Inc

MICROS Systems Inc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Autodesk

Autodesk

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MICROS Systems Inc in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Autodesk in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - MICROS Systems Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MICROS Systems Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Autodesk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Autodesk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MICROS Systems Inc

MICROS Systems Inc

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Malware
MIC1953291023
Autodesk

Autodesk

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between MICROS Systems Inc company and Autodesk company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MICROS Systems Inc company and Autodesk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MICROS Systems Inc company and Autodesk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MICROS Systems Inc company and Autodesk company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MICROS Systems Inc company and Autodesk company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MICROS Systems Inc company and Autodesk company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MICROS Systems Inc company and Autodesk company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MICROS Systems Inc company and Autodesk company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MICROS Systems Inc company and Autodesk company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MICROS Systems Inc company and Autodesk company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MICROS Systems Inc company and Autodesk company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MICROS Systems Inc and Autodesk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MICROS Systems Inc and Autodesk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MICROS Systems Inc or Autodesk ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MICROS Systems Inc or Autodesk ?
Between MICROS Systems Inc and Autodesk, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MICROS Systems Inc and Autodesk, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8