Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Micromax Informatics LtdMicromax Informatics Ltd
VS
LG ElectronicsLG Electronics
Micromax Informatics Ltd

Micromax Informatics Ltd

Micromax House, 90B, Sector 18, Gurgaon, Haryana, 122015, IN

Last Update: 25/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.micromaxinfo.com
763/1000Fair

Micromax Informatics Limited is one of the leading consumer electronics company in India and the 10th largest mobile phone player in the world. Over the past decade, Micromax has pioneered the democratization of technology in India by offering affordable innovations thr...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:2,194
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
LG Electronics

LG Electronics

20 Yeouido-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 150-721, KR

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://globalcareers.lge.com
716/1000Moderate

Step into the innovative world of LG Electronics. As a global leader in technology, LG Electronics is dedicated to creating innovative solutions for a better life. Our brand promise, 'Life's Good', embodies our commitment to ensuring a happier, better life for all.    W...

NAICS:334
NAICS Definition:Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees:63,995
Subsidiaries:36
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Micromax Informatics Ltd

Micromax Informatics Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
LG Electronics

LG Electronics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Micromax Informatics Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LG Electronics in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Micromax Informatics Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Micromax Informatics Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - LG Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LG Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Micromax Informatics Ltd

Micromax Informatics Ltd

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
LG Electronics

LG Electronics

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LG-1232512111725
🔒 Incident : Breach
LGE2248222
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
LGE15121122

FAQ

Between Micromax Informatics Ltd company and LG Electronics company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Micromax Informatics Ltd company and LG Electronics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Micromax Informatics Ltd company and LG Electronics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Micromax Informatics Ltd company and LG Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Micromax Informatics Ltd company and LG Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Micromax Informatics Ltd company and LG Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Micromax Informatics Ltd company and LG Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Micromax Informatics Ltd company and LG Electronics company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Micromax Informatics Ltd company and LG Electronics company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Micromax Informatics Ltd company and LG Electronics company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Micromax Informatics Ltd company and LG Electronics company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Micromax Informatics Ltd and LG Electronics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Micromax Informatics Ltd and LG Electronics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Micromax Informatics Ltd or LG Electronics ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Micromax Informatics Ltd or LG Electronics ?
Between Micromax Informatics Ltd and LG Electronics, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Micromax Informatics Ltd and LG Electronics, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA