Comparison Overview

Microf

VS

J.P. Morgan

Microf

1000 Holcomb Woods Pkwy, Roswell, 30076, US
Last Update: 2025-12-27
Between 600 and 649

Microf was established to accommodate the growing demand for more flexible options surrounding the replacement of a residential heating/cooling system. Our goal is to "restore the heating/cooling needs of the consumer with an affordable monthly payment"​ through our strategic network of actively enrolled contractors. The Microf team is eager to add value to our contractors and consumers by offering flexible and affordable options to restore comfort with competitive solutions across the United States. Contact Microf today for additional information at [email protected] or 855.642.7631. Microf LLC is a Georgia limited liability company and a member of the Better Business Bureau (BBB). Microf is committed to treating each of our partners fairly, honestly, and with respect in all circumstances.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 96
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

J.P. Morgan

270 Park Avenue, New York, NY, US, 10017
Last Update: 2025-12-27
Between 800 and 849

J.P. Morgan is a leader in financial services, offering solutions to clients in more than 100 countries with one of the most comprehensive global product platforms available. We have been helping our clients to do business and manage their wealth for more than 200 years. Our business has been built upon our core principle of putting our clients'​ interests first. J.P. Morgan is part of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM), a global financial services firm. Social Media Terms and Conditions: https://bit.ly/JPMCSocialTerms © 2017 JPMorgan Chase & Co. JPMorgan Chase is an equal opportunity and affirmative action employer Disability/Veteran.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 78,072
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/microf.jpeg
Microf
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jpmorgan.jpeg
J.P. Morgan
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Microf
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
J.P. Morgan
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

Microf has 17.65% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for J.P. Morgan in 2025.

Incident History — Microf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Microf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — J.P. Morgan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

J.P. Morgan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/microf.jpeg
Microf
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Cybercrime, Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jpmorgan.jpeg
J.P. Morgan
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

J.P. Morgan company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Microf company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Microf and J.P. Morgan have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Microf company has reported more cyber incidents than J.P. Morgan company.

Microf company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while J.P. Morgan company has not reported such incidents publicly.

J.P. Morgan company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Microf company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither J.P. Morgan company nor Microf company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Microf company nor J.P. Morgan company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Microf nor J.P. Morgan holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Microf company nor J.P. Morgan company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

J.P. Morgan company employs more people globally than Microf company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Microf nor J.P. Morgan holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Microf nor J.P. Morgan holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Microf nor J.P. Morgan holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Microf nor J.P. Morgan holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Microf nor J.P. Morgan holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Microf nor J.P. Morgan holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to version 2.0.0, in self-hosted n8n instances where the Code node runs in legacy (non-task-runner) JavaScript execution mode, authenticated users with workflow editing access can invoke internal helper functions from within the Code node. This allows a workflow editor to perform actions on the n8n host with the same privileges as the n8n process, including: reading files from the host filesystem (subject to any file-access restrictions configured on the instance and OS/container permissions), and writing files to the host filesystem (subject to the same restrictions). This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve limiting file operations by setting N8N_RESTRICT_FILE_ACCESS_TO to a dedicated directory (e.g., ~/.n8n-files) and ensure it contains no sensitive data, keeping N8N_BLOCK_FILE_ACCESS_TO_N8N_FILES=true (default) to block access to .n8n and user-defined config files, and disabling high-risk nodes (including the Code node) using NODES_EXCLUDE if workflow editors are not fully trusted.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. From version 1.0.0 to before 2.0.0, a sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in the Python Code Node that uses Pyodide. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows can exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the host system running n8n, using the same privileges as the n8n process. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve disabling the Code Node by setting the environment variable NODES_EXCLUDE: "[\"n8n-nodes-base.code\"]", disabling Python support in the Code node by setting the environment variable N8N_PYTHON_ENABLED=false, which was introduced in n8n version 1.104.0, and configuring n8n to use the task runner based Python sandbox via the N8N_RUNNERS_ENABLED and N8N_NATIVE_PYTHON_RUNNER environment variables.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

LMDeploy is a toolkit for compressing, deploying, and serving LLMs. Prior to version 0.11.1, an insecure deserialization vulnerability exists in lmdeploy where torch.load() is called without the weights_only=True parameter when loading model checkpoint files. This allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the victim's machine when they load a malicious .bin or .pt model file. This issue has been patched in version 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to version 1.114.0, a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability may occur in n8n when using the “Respond to Webhook” node. When this node responds with HTML content containing executable scripts, the payload may execute directly in the top-level window, rather than within the expected sandbox introduced in version 1.103.0. This behavior can enable a malicious actor with workflow creation permissions to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the n8n editor interface. This issue has been patched in version 1.114.0. Workarounds for this issue involve restricting workflow creation and modification privileges to trusted users only, avoiding use of untrusted HTML responses in the “Respond to Webhook” node, and using an external reverse proxy or HTML sanitizer to filter responses that include executable scripts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Yealink T21P_E2 Phone 52.84.0.15 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal. A remote normal privileged attacker can read arbitrary files via a crafted request result read function of the diagnostic component.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N