Comparison Overview

Microf

VS

Capital Group

Microf

1000 Holcomb Woods Pkwy, Roswell, 30076, US
Last Update: 2025-12-27
Between 600 and 649

Microf was established to accommodate the growing demand for more flexible options surrounding the replacement of a residential heating/cooling system. Our goal is to "restore the heating/cooling needs of the consumer with an affordable monthly payment"​ through our strategic network of actively enrolled contractors. The Microf team is eager to add value to our contractors and consumers by offering flexible and affordable options to restore comfort with competitive solutions across the United States. Contact Microf today for additional information at [email protected] or 855.642.7631. Microf LLC is a Georgia limited liability company and a member of the Better Business Bureau (BBB). Microf is committed to treating each of our partners fairly, honestly, and with respect in all circumstances.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 96
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Capital Group

333 South Hope Street, None, Los Angeles, CA, US, 90071
Last Update: 2025-12-25

Capital Group was established in 1931 in Los Angeles, California, and now has 31 offices around the globe. For over 90 years we've provided carefully researched investment solutions and services to financial professionals. *** We've been made aware of an employment scam fraudulently using Capital Group's name. Please note: Capital Group currently does not offer 100% remote work positions. On average, the interview process can take one to three months to go from resume submission to offer. Financial transactions are never part of the job on boarding process. For your own cyber safety and security, if you suspect fraud, please do not respond to or interact with messages claiming to be from Capital Group. You can also contact [email protected] to verify a job opportunity.*** This content is published by Capital Group, home of American Funds Distributors, Inc. which will be renamed Capital Client Group, Inc. on or around July 1, 2024. For important legal information please click the company details website link: https://www.capitalgroup.com/us/landing-pages/linkedin-terms-of-use.html

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 10,374
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/microf.jpeg
Microf
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capital-group.jpeg
Capital Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Microf
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Capital Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

Microf has 17.65% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capital Group in 2025.

Incident History — Microf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Microf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Capital Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capital Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/microf.jpeg
Microf
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Cybercrime, Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capital-group.jpeg
Capital Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Capital Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Microf company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Microf company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Capital Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Microf company has reported more cyber incidents than Capital Group company.

Microf company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Capital Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Capital Group company nor Microf company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Capital Group company nor Microf company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Microf company nor Capital Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Microf nor Capital Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Capital Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Microf company.

Capital Group company employs more people globally than Microf company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Microf nor Capital Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Microf nor Capital Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Microf nor Capital Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Microf nor Capital Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Microf nor Capital Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Microf nor Capital Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to version 2.0.0, in self-hosted n8n instances where the Code node runs in legacy (non-task-runner) JavaScript execution mode, authenticated users with workflow editing access can invoke internal helper functions from within the Code node. This allows a workflow editor to perform actions on the n8n host with the same privileges as the n8n process, including: reading files from the host filesystem (subject to any file-access restrictions configured on the instance and OS/container permissions), and writing files to the host filesystem (subject to the same restrictions). This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve limiting file operations by setting N8N_RESTRICT_FILE_ACCESS_TO to a dedicated directory (e.g., ~/.n8n-files) and ensure it contains no sensitive data, keeping N8N_BLOCK_FILE_ACCESS_TO_N8N_FILES=true (default) to block access to .n8n and user-defined config files, and disabling high-risk nodes (including the Code node) using NODES_EXCLUDE if workflow editors are not fully trusted.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. From version 1.0.0 to before 2.0.0, a sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in the Python Code Node that uses Pyodide. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows can exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the host system running n8n, using the same privileges as the n8n process. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve disabling the Code Node by setting the environment variable NODES_EXCLUDE: "[\"n8n-nodes-base.code\"]", disabling Python support in the Code node by setting the environment variable N8N_PYTHON_ENABLED=false, which was introduced in n8n version 1.104.0, and configuring n8n to use the task runner based Python sandbox via the N8N_RUNNERS_ENABLED and N8N_NATIVE_PYTHON_RUNNER environment variables.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

LMDeploy is a toolkit for compressing, deploying, and serving LLMs. Prior to version 0.11.1, an insecure deserialization vulnerability exists in lmdeploy where torch.load() is called without the weights_only=True parameter when loading model checkpoint files. This allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the victim's machine when they load a malicious .bin or .pt model file. This issue has been patched in version 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to version 1.114.0, a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability may occur in n8n when using the “Respond to Webhook” node. When this node responds with HTML content containing executable scripts, the payload may execute directly in the top-level window, rather than within the expected sandbox introduced in version 1.103.0. This behavior can enable a malicious actor with workflow creation permissions to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the n8n editor interface. This issue has been patched in version 1.114.0. Workarounds for this issue involve restricting workflow creation and modification privileges to trusted users only, avoiding use of untrusted HTML responses in the “Respond to Webhook” node, and using an external reverse proxy or HTML sanitizer to filter responses that include executable scripts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Yealink T21P_E2 Phone 52.84.0.15 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal. A remote normal privileged attacker can read arbitrary files via a crafted request result read function of the diagnostic component.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N