Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Michigan Community Service CommissionMichigan Community Service Commission
VS
Malmö stadMalmö stad
Michigan Community Service Commission

Michigan Community Service Commission

N/A

Last Update: 19/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.Michigan.gov/MCSC
758/1000Fair

Building a culture of service by providing vision and resources to strengthen communities through volunteerism. Our 2020-2022 State Service Plan: https://www.michigan.gov/documents/leo/MCSC_SSP_20200115_678435_7.pdf

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:15
Subsidiaries:43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Malmö stad

Malmö stad

August Palms plats 1, Malmö, 205 80, SE

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://malmo.se/jobb
779/1000Fair

Bli en samhällsbyggare – jobba i Malmö stad! Genom att arbeta i Malmö stad får du möjlighet att arbeta med hållbar samhällsutveckling. Som en samhällsbyggare spelar du en viktig roll i Malmös utveckling och därför ser vi oss som framtidens arbetsplats. Människors lik...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:14,500
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Michigan Community Service Commission

Michigan Community Service Commission

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Malmö stad

Malmö stad

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Michigan Community Service Commission in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Malmö stad in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Michigan Community Service Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Michigan Community Service Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Malmö stad (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Malmö stad cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Michigan Community Service Commission

Michigan Community Service Commission

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Malmö stad

Malmö stad

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Michigan Community Service Commission company and Malmö stad company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Michigan Community Service Commission company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Michigan Community Service Commission company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Michigan Community Service Commission company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Michigan Community Service Commission company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Michigan Community Service Commission company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Michigan Community Service Commission company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Michigan Community Service Commission company and Malmö stad company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Michigan Community Service Commission company and Malmö stad company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Michigan Community Service Commission company and Malmö stad company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Michigan Community Service Commission company and Malmö stad company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Michigan Community Service Commission and Malmö stad, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Michigan Community Service Commission and Malmö stad, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Michigan Community Service Commission or Malmö stad ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Michigan Community Service Commission or Malmö stad ?
Between Michigan Community Service Commission and Malmö stad, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Michigan Community Service Commission and Malmö stad, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-61246
SUMMARY

Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-22
UPDATED
Date2026-07-22
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-60455
SUMMARY

Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-22
UPDATED
Date2026-07-22
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-60439
SUMMARY

Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-22
UPDATED
Date2026-07-22
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-60373
SUMMARY

Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-22
UPDATED
Date2026-07-22
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-60372
SUMMARY

Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-22
UPDATED
Date2026-07-22
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
REFERENCES