MSU A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
MSU
Company Information
Website:http://msu.edu
Employees number:25,674
Number of followers:604,029
NAICS:6113
Industry Type:Higher Education
Homepage:msu.edu
MSU Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 650 and 699
MSUHigher Education
Updated:
02/04/2026
02/04/2026
689/1000
Weak
B
MSU Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
MSUHigher Education
Score locked

MSUWeak
Current Score
689B (WEAK)
01000
4 incidents
-91 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
694
MAY 2026
692
APRIL 2026
690
MARCH 2026
687
FEBRUARY 2026
686
JANUARY 2026
683
DECEMBER 2025
681
NOVEMBER 2025
678
OCTOBER 2025
675
SEPTEMBER 2025
672
AUGUST 2025
757
Ransomware
31 Jul 2025 • MSU
Michigan State University, Yale University and Johns Hopkins University: Zscaler warns that ransomware attacks on oil and gas surge 935%, as critical sectors targeted
Ransomware Attacks Surge Across Critical Sectors, Fueled by AI and Automation
666
CRITICAL-91
JOHMICYAL1770890509
Ransomware Attacks Surge Across Critical Sectors, Fueled by AI and Automation
A new report from Zscaler’s ThreatLabz reveals a sharp escalation in ransomware attacks, with manufacturing, technology, and healthcare remaining the most targeted industries sectors where disruption yields maximum leverage for cybercriminals. The oil and gas industry saw an alarming 935.3% year-over-year increase in attacks, driven by growing automation in infrastructure and outdated security practices that expose critical systems.
Healthcare, a long-standing favorite for ransomware operators, experienced a 115.4% rise in attacks, with research from Michigan State, Yale, and Johns Hopkins universities identifying ransomware as a leading cause of data breaches in the sector. The Interlock ransomware gang was linked to recent high-profile attacks on major healthcare organizations, underscoring the sector’s vulnerability.
Public extortion tactics surged, with leak site postings increasing by 70.1% as attackers prioritize reputational and regulatory damage over encryption alone. The top 10 ransomware families exfiltrated 238.5 terabytes of data in the past year a 92.7% increase highlighting data theft as a core extortion strategy.
Geographically, the U.S. bore the brunt of attacks, accounting for 50.8% of global incidents, with 3,671 recorded attacks more than the combined total of the next 14 most-targeted countries. Canada saw a 194.5% spike, reflecting threat actors’ expanding focus on North America’s vulnerable sectors. The Canadian Centre for Cyber Security’s latest assessment names ransomware as the top cybercrime threat to the nation’s critical infrastructure.
RansomHub emerged as the most prolific group, claiming 833 victims before abruptly ceasing operations in April 2025. Akira (520 victims) and Clop (488 victims) also ranked among the most active, with Clop leveraging supply chain attacks to maximize impact. The ransomware ecosystem remains volatile, with 34 new families identified in the past year, bringing the total tracked to 425. Many groups rebrand or resurface under new names to evade sanctions or fill gaps left by disbanded operations.
Despite the surge in attacks, law enforcement has made progress in disrupting ransomware infrastructure. Operation Endgame, a global initiative supported by Zscaler, recently dismantled DanaBot, a modular malware-as-a-service platform linked to multiple ransomware groups. Previous operations in 2024 targeted malware families like SmokeLoader, IcedID, and Pikabot, demonstrating the impact of coordinated public-private efforts.
Generative AI is amplifying ransomware threats, enabling attackers to automate phishing lures, malware development, and data extraction. Vishing (voice-based phishing) is increasingly integrated into attacks, with AI-generated audio making scams more convincing. Zscaler predicts that in 2026, AI will further refine multi-phase extortion campaigns, while precision social engineering using platforms like LinkedIn to target privileged users will intensify.
Data theft will remain the primary extortion tactic, with groups like Clop and BianLian shifting away from encryption as organizations improve recovery defenses. Leaked ransomware tools and source code are also fueling a wave of low-effort, high-impact attacks, enabling new groups to quickly adapt and evade detection. Meanwhile, the ransomware-as-a-service model continues to drive instability, with affiliates frequently rebranding or switching groups in response to law enforcement pressure.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
JULY 2025
757
MAY 2020
750
Ransomware
01 May 2020 • MSU
Michigan State University
Ransomware Attack on Michigan State University
666
CRITICAL-84
MIC021281222
Michigan State University fell victim to the Netwalker ransomware group and the group also gave them a deadline to pay ransomware attackers under the threat that they will leak the files stolen from the institution’s network to the public.
The group also posted images with directories, a passport scan, and two financial documents allegedly stolen from the university’s network as proof.
The researchers also discovered individual samples of the Zeppelin Windows ransomware and the Smaug Linux ransomware as well in the systems.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
NOVEMBER 2016
744
Breach
01 Nov 2016 • MSU
Michigan State University
Michigan State University Data Breach
693
CRITICAL-51
MIC22151123
The Michigan State University was breached by cybercriminals who attempted to blackmail the institution by attempting to profit from the hacking of a database that held 400,000 records of students and employees.
An unauthorised entity gained access to one of the organization's servers, according to Michigan State University, which reported a data breach.
There were names, social security numbers, and MSU identifying numbers of some current and past students and staff members in the database, which held over 400,000 information. Passwords, financial, educational, contact, or health information were not included.
Upon finding the intrusion, the institution stated it immediately pulled the impacted database down and ascertained that the hackers had only seen 449 documents out of the total.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
OCTOBER 2016
811
Breach
01 Oct 2016 • MSU
Michigan State University
Michigan State University Database Breach
743
HIGH-68
MIC1115311023
The youthful cybercriminal Mys7erioN declared that he had breached the database of Michigan State University, a US organisation.
The exposed information includes names, logins, phone numbers, published emails, and encrypted passwords, was made public on Pastebin by Mys7erioN as evidence of the hack.
There appears to be an updated user list in one of the tables, gelstaff_mp2016. Additionally, the hacker posted the data—roughly 500 login credentials and 222 personal details—on Pastebin.
The hacker found a SQL injection vulnerability in Michigan State University's systems while browsing many websites.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for MSU ??
What was MSU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was MSU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was MSU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was MSU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was MSU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was MSU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was MSU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was MSU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What was MSU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ??
What was MSU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ??
What was MSU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on MSU's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with MSU ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view MSU's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?